Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 81629 - gcc-3.3.5-r1 compile error (FATAL: Can't write expr.o: File truncated)
Summary: gcc-3.3.5-r1 compile error (FATAL: Can't write expr.o: File truncated)
Status: RESOLVED NEEDINFO
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] GCC Porting (show other bugs)
Hardware: All All
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Toolchain Maintainers
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-02-11 07:50 UTC by Lars Strojny
Modified: 2005-12-11 19:36 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Lars Strojny 2005-02-11 07:50:17 UTC
$ emerge gcc
/var/tmp/portage/gcc-3.3.5-r1/temp/ccbTjQ8X.s:24086: Error: value of 000ffffffffffffc too large for field of 4 bytes at 00100000000137dc
/var/tmp/portage/gcc-3.3.5-r1/temp/ccbTjQ8X.s:24093: Error: value of 000ffffffffffffc too large for field of 4 bytes at 0010000000013801
/var/tmp/portage/gcc-3.3.5-r1/temp/ccbTjQ8X.s:24104: Error: value of 000ffffffffffffc too large for field of 4 bytes at 0010000000013823
/var/tmp/portage/gcc-3.3.5-r1/temp/ccbTjQ8X.s:24113: Error: value of 000ffffffffffffc too large for field of 4 bytes at 001000000001383c
/var/tmp/portage/gcc-3.3.5-r1/temp/ccbTjQ8X.s:24187: Error: value of 000ffffffffffffc too large for field of 4 bytes at 0010000000013941
/var/tmp/portage/gcc-3.3.5-r1/temp/ccbTjQ8X.s:24198: Error: value of 000ffffffffffffc too large for field of 4 bytes at 001000000001396d
/var/tmp/portage/gcc-3.3.5-r1/temp/ccbTjQ8X.s:24257: Error: value of 000ffffffffffffc too large for field of 4 bytes at 0010000000013a3a
/var/tmp/portage/gcc-3.3.5-r1/temp/ccbTjQ8X.s:24292: Error: value of 000ffffffffffffc too large for field of 4 bytes at 0010000000013a7f
/var/tmp/portage/gcc-3.3.5-r1/temp/ccbTjQ8X.s:24324: Error: value of 000ffffffffffffc too large for field of 4 bytes at 0010000000013ac6
/var/tmp/portage/gcc-3.3.5-r1/temp/ccbTjQ8X.s:24357: Error: value of 000ffffffffffffc too large for field of 4 bytes at 0010000000013b0d
/var/tmp/portage/gcc-3.3.5-r1/temp/ccbTjQ8X.s:24388: Error: value of 000ffffffffffffc too large for field of 4 bytes at 0010000000013b93
/var/tmp/portage/gcc-3.3.5-r1/temp/ccbTjQ8X.s:24426: Error: value of 000ffffffffffffc too large for field of 4 bytes at 0010000000013c4c
/var/tmp/portage/gcc-3.3.5-r1/temp/ccbTjQ8X.s:24469: Error: value of 000ffffffffffffc too large for field of 4 bytes at 0010000000013cab
/var/tmp/portage/gcc-3.3.5-r1/temp/ccbTjQ8X.s:24506: Error: value of 000ffffffffffffc too large for field of 4 bytes at 0010000000013d40
/var/tmp/portage/gcc-3.3.5-r1/temp/ccbTjQ8X.s:24508: Error: value of 000ffffffffffffc too large for field of 4 bytes at 0010000000013d47
/var/tmp/portage/gcc-3.3.5-r1/temp/ccbTjQ8X.s:24511: Error: value of 000ffffffffffffc too large for field of 4 bytes at 0010000000013d57
/var/tmp/portage/gcc-3.3.5-r1/temp/ccbTjQ8X.s:24513: Error: value of 000ffffffffffffc too large for field of 4 bytes at 0010000000013d5e
/var/tmp/portage/gcc-3.3.5-r1/temp/ccbTjQ8X.s:24519: Error: value of 000ffffffffffffc too large for field of 4 bytes at 0010000000013d81
/var/tmp/portage/gcc-3.3.5-r1/temp/ccbTjQ8X.s:24536: Error: value of 000ffffffffffffc too large for field of 4 bytes at 0010000000013dba
/var/tmp/portage/gcc-3.3.5-r1/temp/ccbTjQ8X.s:24548: Error: value of 000ffffffffffd1b too large for field of 4 bytes at 0010000000013de4
/var/tmp/portage/gcc-3.3.5-r1/temp/ccbTjQ8X.s:24579: Error: value of 000ffffffffffffc too large for field of 4 bytes at 0010000000013e1e
/var/tmp/portage/gcc-3.3.5-r1/temp/ccbTjQ8X.s:24693: Error: value of 000ffffffffffffc too large for field of 4 bytes at 0010000000013f4c
expr.o: File truncated
/var/tmp/portage/gcc-3.3.5-r1/temp/ccbTjQ8X.s:24971: FATAL: Can't write expr.o: File truncated
make[2]: *** [expr.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [stage1_build] Error 2
make: *** [bootstrap-lean] Error 2

!!! ERROR: sys-devel/gcc-3.3.5-r1 failed.
!!! Function gcc_do_make, Line 1092, Exitcode 2
!!! emake failed with bootstrap-lean
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, NOT this status message.


$ emerge info
Comment 1 Lars Strojny 2005-02-11 07:50:48 UTC
Sorry, commited to early, here is the ouput of emerge system.
Portage 2.0.51-r15 (default-linux/x86/2004.3, gcc-3.3.4, glibc-2.3.4.20041102-r0, 2.6.10-as3-adorno i686)
=================================================================
System uname: 2.6.10-as3-adorno i686 Pentium III (Katmai)
Gentoo Base System version 1.6.8
Python:              dev-lang/python-2.3.4-r1 [2.3.4 (#1, Feb 11 2005, 05:40:28)]
dev-lang/python:     2.3.4-r1
sys-devel/autoconf:  2.59-r5
sys-devel/automake:  1.8.5-r1
sys-devel/binutils:  2.15.92.0.2-r1
sys-devel/libtool:   1.5.2-r7
virtual/os-headers:  2.6.8.1, 2.6.8.1-r1
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86"
AUTOCLEAN="yes"
CFLAGS="-O2 -mcpu=i686 -pipe"
CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/kde/2/share/config /usr/kde/3/share/config /usr/share/config /var/qmail/alias /var/qmail/control"
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/gconf /etc/terminfo /etc/env.d"
CXXFLAGS=""
DISTDIR="/mnt/portage/files/"
FEATURES="autoaddcvs autoconfig ccache collision-protect distlocks maketest sandbox severe sfperms strict test userpriv usersandbox"
GENTOO_MIRRORS=""
LANG="de_DE.utf-8"
LC_ALL="de_de.UTF-8"
LDFLAGS="-Wl,-O1 -Wl,--enable-new-dtags -Wl,--sort-common -s"
MAKEOPTS="-s"
PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages"
PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp"
PORTDIR="/usr/portage"
PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/mnt/portage/overlay-portage"
SYNC="rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage"
USE="x86 aac acl apache2 audiofile bash-completion bitmap bzlib calendar cpdflib crypt exif flac ftp gd gd-external gif hardened iconv icq imap ipv6 ithreads jpeg ldap mad makecheck mbox mikmod mysql ncurses nls nogcj nptl nptlonly oggvorbis pam pcre pdflib pic pie png postgres python samba session sharedmem simplexml skey sockets sqlite ssl suexec threads tiff truetype unicode userlocales vhosts xfs xml xml2 xmlrpc zlib"
Unset:  ASFLAGS, CBUILD, CTARGET
Comment 2 Lars Strojny 2005-06-03 09:08:48 UTC
Is there a possibility to get at least a *small* comment on this? It's a bit
stressy, not to have a chance to update GCC since half a year or so
Comment 3 Mark Loeser (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-11 19:36:50 UTC
Try with the newest stable version of gcc and reopen the bug if its still an issue.