Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 808755 - =dev-util/ltrace-0.7.3.6.1: stabilisation request
Summary: =dev-util/ltrace-0.7.3.6.1: stabilisation request
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Stabilization (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Marek Szuba
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: CC-ARCHES
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2021-08-17 13:39 UTC by Marek Szuba
Modified: 2021-11-18 05:41 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
=dev-util/ltrace-0.7.3.6.1
Runtime testing required: ---
nattka: sanity-check+


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Marek Szuba archtester gentoo-dev 2021-08-17 13:39:32 UTC
(insert witty message here)
Comment 1 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2021-08-18 12:46:57 UTC
amd64 stable
Comment 2 ernsteiswuerfel archtester 2021-08-23 22:47:25 UTC
Fails one test on ppc (bug #809890).
Comment 3 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2021-09-27 09:43:12 UTC
@maintainer(s):
I see open bugs about test failure. Atm I'm reproducing the issue on ppc. Can you clarify if you want to care about tests or we should stabilize while the tests are failing? Thanks.
Comment 4 Marek Szuba archtester gentoo-dev 2021-09-27 13:56:54 UTC
As reported in Bug #809890, the previous version failed this test on ppc as well. Therefore, go ahead and stabilise this one on ppc even if you can reproduce this test failure.
Comment 5 Marek Szuba archtester gentoo-dev 2021-11-16 11:23:17 UTC
Again, the current stable version exhibits the same behaviour so we do not gain anything by delaying stabilisation of 0.7.3.6.1.
Comment 6 Sam James archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2021-11-16 11:47:47 UTC
(In reply to Marek Szuba from comment #5)
> Again, the current stable version exhibits the same behaviour so we do not
> gain anything by delaying stabilisation of 0.7.3.6.1.

I'd suggest trying to skip the test given it adds a fair bit of confusion for arch testers.
Comment 7 Marek Szuba archtester gentoo-dev 2021-11-16 11:53:07 UTC
(In reply to Sam James from comment #6)

> I'd suggest trying to skip the test given it adds a fair bit of confusion
> for arch testers.

Will do that if I cannot figure out what the problem with this test is.
Comment 8 Sam James archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2021-11-17 22:46:51 UTC
x86 done
Comment 9 Sam James archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2021-11-18 05:37:40 UTC
ppc done

all arches done
Comment 10 Sam James archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2021-11-18 05:41:20 UTC
(In reply to Marek Szuba from comment #7)
> (In reply to Sam James from comment #6)
> 
> > I'd suggest trying to skip the test given it adds a fair bit of confusion
> > for arch testers.
> 
> Will do that if I cannot figure out what the problem with this test is.

thanks marecki!