Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 80365 - CIFS not handled by netmount
Summary: CIFS not handled by netmount
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Core system (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo's Team for Core System packages
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
: 81207 85742 89081 94159 95386 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-02-01 11:22 UTC by Mike Hurley
Modified: 2005-06-07 14:29 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Mike Hurley 2005-02-01 11:22:23 UTC 
Did not see a bug report about this so sorry if a duplicate.

The way netmount is written makes CIFS shares be treated like local mounts.
This is not good since local mounts are done before network cards are brought up.

Error message from kernel:
 CIFS VFS: Error connecting to IPv4 socket. Aborting operation
 CIFS VFS: cifs_mount failed w/return code = -101
 CIFS VFS: Error connecting to IPv4 socket. Aborting operation
 CIFS VFS: cifs_mount failed w/return code = -101

(trying to mount 2 CIFS shares at boot)

There is a relatively easy fix:
edit /etc/init.d/netmount
every place there is a list of FSs, add 'cifs' in a similar manner.
edit /etc/init.d/localmount
find the list of 'nonfs,nosmbfs,...' and add ',nocifs'
Comment 1 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2005-02-01 12:52:59 UTC 
was fixed in baselayout-1.11.x a while ago
Comment 2 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2005-02-08 04:37:40 UTC 
*** Bug 81207 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2005-03-18 06:11:12 UTC 
*** Bug 85742 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2005-04-14 21:57:44 UTC 
*** Bug 89081 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-05-27 03:27:03 UTC 
*** Bug 94159 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-06-07 14:29:49 UTC 
*** Bug 95386 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***