797709 – net-misc/croc-9.1.6 fails tests

Bug 797709 - net-misc/croc-9.1.6 fails tests

Summary: net-misc/croc-9.1.6 fails tests

Status:	RESOLVED OBSOLETE

Alias:	None

Product:	Gentoo Linux
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware:	All Linux

Importance:	Normal normal (vote)
Assignee:	Stephan Hartmann (RETIRED)

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2021-06-23 02:36 UTC by Jonathan Lovelace
Modified:	2021-10-18 21:19 UTC (History)
CC List:	1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required:	---

Attachments
net-misc:croc-9.1.6:20210623-021520.log (net-misc:croc-9.1.6:20210623-021520.log,768.53 KB, text/x-log) 2021-06-23 02:36 UTC, Jonathan Lovelace	Details
emerge-info.txt (emerge-info.txt,8.14 KB, text/plain) 2021-06-23 02:36 UTC, Jonathan Lovelace	Details
net-misc:croc-9.2.0:20210702-191534.log (net-misc:croc-9.2.0:20210702-191534.log,773.48 KB, text/x-log) 2021-07-02 19:51 UTC, Jonathan Lovelace	Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Jonathan Lovelace 2021-06-23 02:36:38 UTC

Created attachment 717804 [details]
net-misc:croc-9.1.6:20210623-021520.log

On one of my three machines, =net-misc/croc-9.1.6 (and also 9.1.5, but 9.1.4 was fine as of a month ago) fails its test phase. (This is the slowest of my three machines, making me suspect there might be a timeout involved somewhere?)

Full build log and emerge --info output attached.

Comment 1 Jonathan Lovelace 2021-06-23 02:36:51 UTC

Created attachment 717807 [details]
emerge-info.txt

Comment 2 Stephan Hartmann (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2021-06-23 09:24:52 UTC

Can you re-check with 9.2.0?

Comment 3 Jonathan Lovelace 2021-07-02 19:51:55 UTC

Created attachment 721107 [details]
net-misc:croc-9.2.0:20210702-191534.log

The one system on which I see the error has only just last night caught up enough with updates for me to try, but once I'd synced the Portage tree I tried 9.2.0, and it fails apparently-similarly. (Build log attached.)

Comment 4 Jonathan Lovelace 2021-10-18 21:19:13 UTC

9.2.1 apparently passed its tests and installed without issue on the machine in question, and while my first time attempting 9.4.2 it failed at least one test, a second attempt passed the test suite.