Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 79415 - kernel support for netmos 9835/9735 crippled since 2.6.9
Summary: kernel support for netmos 9835/9735 crippled since 2.6.9
Status: RESOLVED TEST-REQUEST
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Core system (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Kernel Bug Wranglers and Kernel Maintainers
URL: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.c...
Whiteboard:
Keywords: Inclusion
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-01-24 19:50 UTC by Steven Brudenell
Modified: 2005-04-28 09:32 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Steven Brudenell 2005-01-24 19:50:45 UTC
In kernel 2.6.9, a patch was added to parport_pc to support the parallel port on netmos 9835 and 9735 chipsets, which are found on combo parallel/serial pci cards. Support for these chips already existed in parport_serial prior to this. Since parport_serial depends on parport_pc, parport_pc always gets loaded first, with limited (parallel port only) support for these cards, and the complete (parallel+serial) functionality in parport_serial is superseded. The serial functionality of these cards does not work in either 2.6.9 or 2.6.10.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Obtain NetMos 9835 or 9735 board.
2. Compile linux 2.6.9 or 2.6.10 with support for parport_serial enabled (built-in or module, either way works).
3. Boot with this kernel.

Actual Results:  
Only the parallel port on this board is identified.

Expected Results:  
Both the parallel port and the serial ports (there are two on the 9835, which I
have) should be identified.

I have read of other people having an identical problem, with the same boards on
the same kernel version.
Removing support in parport_pc for these netmos boards produces the required
functionality.
Using 2.6.8.1 with the same configuration also works.
Comment 1 Patrick Lauer gentoo-dev 2005-01-25 01:49:13 UTC
most likely WONTFIX / UPSTREAM I guess ...
Comment 2 Daniel Drake (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-01-25 04:16:04 UTC
Can you please try 2.6.11-rc2?
Comment 3 Daniel Drake (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-02-09 07:57:31 UTC
Please reopen when you test 2.6.11-rc3
Comment 4 Steven Brudenell 2005-03-10 00:26:34 UTC
Tried 2.6.11. Problem still exists.
Comment 5 Daniel Drake (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-03-12 17:28:47 UTC
Please file a bug for this at http://bugzilla.kernel.org and post the resultant URL here.
Comment 6 Steven Brudenell 2005-03-13 09:18:35 UTC
Done.

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4334
Comment 7 Daniel Drake (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-04-01 01:25:07 UTC
A fix is now available in Linus' tree, could you please apply these 2 patches to 2.6.11 in this order:

http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.6/gnupatch@4239fab69YNpq9VuPBav49ahH2q9KA
http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.6/gnupatch@4248d4312r_MDzERKgwoV7OXHM_MKw

If that solves the problem, I'll include them in the next release
Comment 8 Daniel Drake (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-04-13 08:58:37 UTC
Bump..please could you try those patches?
Comment 9 Daniel Drake (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-04-28 09:32:31 UTC
Closing due to inactivity. If you can confirm the fixes work I will add them to the tree.