"Stack-Overflow in PdfEncrypt.cpp" Upstream report: https://sourceforge.net/p/podofo/tickets/132/
* CVE-2021-30470 Description: "A flaw was found in PoDoFo 0.9.7. An uncontrolled recursive call among PdfTokenizer::ReadArray(), PdfTokenizer::GetNextVariant() and PdfTokenizer::ReadDataType() functions can lead to a stack overflow." https://sourceforge.net/p/podofo/tickets/130/ * CVE-2021-30471 Description: "A flaw was found in PoDoFo 0.9.7. An uncontrolled recursive call in PdfNamesTree::AddToDictionary function in src/podofo/doc/PdfNamesTree.cpp can lead to a stack overflow." https://sourceforge.net/p/podofo/tickets/131/ * CVE-2021-30469 Description: "A flaw was found in PoDoFo 0.9.7. An use-after-free in PoDoFo::PdfVecObjects::Clear() function can cause a denial of service via a crafted PDF file." https://sourceforge.net/p/podofo/tickets/129/
Package list is empty or all packages have requested keywords.
CVE-2020-18971 (https://sourceforge.net/p/podofo/tickets/48/): Stack-based Buffer Overflow in PoDoFo v0.9.6 allows attackers to cause a denial of service via the component 'src/base/PdfDictionary.cpp:65'. CVE-2020-18972 (https://sourceforge.net/p/podofo/tickets/49/): Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor in PoDoFo v0.9.6 allows attackers to obtain sensitive information via 'IsNextToken' in the component 'src/base/PdfToenizer.cpp'. Seems there's some confusion about the validity of both of these.