Bug 782481 – dev-python/QtPy-1.9.0-r3: stablereq

• Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Michał Górny 2021-04-12 10:28:30 UTC]

Please stabilize.

[Comment 1 Sam James 2021-05-16 18:22:22 UTC]

We need eselect-QtPy for arm64 to be stabled, I’m on mobile so I can’t check properly but I don’t see how the sanity check is + atm?

[Comment 2 Nowa Ammerlaan 2021-05-16 18:34:57 UTC]

> We need eselect-QtPy for arm64 to be stabled, I’m on mobile so I can’t check properly but I don’t see how the sanity check is + atm?

Good point, not sure what is going on and why this is +, but we'll definitely need eselect-qtpy and pyside2 too for this to work.

[addCollapseLink(3, 1, 'Toggle comment display'); [+] Comment 3 NATTkA bot 2021-05-16 18:36:22 UTC Comment hidden (obsolete)]

Unable to check for sanity:

> no match for package: app-eselect/QtPy-1.0

[addCollapseLink(4, 1, 'Toggle comment display'); [+] Comment 4 NATTkA bot 2021-05-16 18:40:26 UTC Comment hidden (obsolete)]

Sanity check failed:

> dev-python/pyside2-5.15.1
>   depend arm64 stable profile default/linux/arm64/17.0 (9 total)
>     x11-misc/xvfb-run

[addCollapseLink(5, 1, 'Toggle comment display'); [+] Comment 5 NATTkA bot 2021-05-16 18:48:24 UTC Comment hidden (obsolete)]

All sanity-check issues have been resolved

[Comment 6 Agostino Sarubbo 2021-05-18 06:29:53 UTC]

x86 stable

[Comment 7 Sam James 2021-05-18 06:37:53 UTC]

I’m wondering if this was due to e.g UncheckableDeps and nattka not recognising it?

[Comment 8 Michał Górny 2021-05-18 06:52:01 UTC]

Oh my, UncheckableDep again? :-(  I should have made it an error once we fixed LLVM & co.

[Comment 9 Michał Górny 2021-05-18 06:56:05 UTC]

I'm going to abort this since the ebuild is incorrect.

[Comment 10 NATTkA bot 2021-05-18 06:56:23 UTC]

Resetting sanity check; keywords are not fully specified and arches are not CC-ed.

[Comment 11 Sam James 2021-05-18 07:14:25 UTC]

(In reply to Michał Górny from comment #8)
> Oh my, UncheckableDep again? :-(  I should have made it an error once we
> fixed LLVM & co.

Let’s do that separately, agreed.