libgd.so -> /var/tmp/portage/libgd-2.0.1/image//usr/lib/libgd.so.2.0.0 libgd version is 2.0.1 I tried to reemerge libgd and I see this: >>> md5 ;-) gd-2.0.1.tar.gz >>> Unpacking source... >>> Unpacking gd-2.0.1.tar.gz patch: option requires an argument -- p patch: Try `patch --help' for more information. >>> Source unpacked. It seems patch doesn't like its parameters...
this should be added before preplib /usr in the libgd 2.0.1 ebuild: rm ${D}/usr/lib/libgd.so.2 rm ${D}/usr/lib/libgd.so this after preplib /usr: dosym libgd.so.2.0.0 /usr/lib/libgd.so.2 dosym libgd.so.2.0.0 /usr/lib/libgd.so the patch is imo unnecessary, it applies correctly when the patch line is corrected (should be -p1) but its not used by the ebuild and produces the error that config.status is missing because configure wasn't executed
I can handle that broken link, but is that patch necessary or not ? If yes, maybe that ebuild should be fixed so libgd could be compiled with the patch applied...
libgd-2 is removed from the portage tree anyway, it was too problematic.
*** Bug 7961 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 8002 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
