Bug 7788 – cyrus-imapd-2.1.9: sandbox problem

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Markus Wagner 2002-09-11 04:50:51 UTC]

Hi!  
  
I get following error if "perl" is included in USE:  
  
 make[1]: Leaving directory  
`/usr/tmp/portage/cyrus-imapd-2.1.9-r1/work/cyrus-imapd-2.1.9/notifyd'  
perl  
ACCESS DENIED  mkdir:     /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/i686-linux/auto/Cyrus  
mkdir /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/i686-linux/auto/Cyrus: Permission denied  
at /usr/lib/perl5/5.6.1/ExtUtils/Install.pm line 137  
make: *** [pure_site_install] Error 255  
  
!!! ERROR: The ebuild did not complete successfully.  
!!! Function perl-module_src_install, Line -656, Exitcode 2  
!!! (no error message)  
  
--------------------------- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY  
---------------------------  
LOG FILE = "/tmp/sandbox-cyrus-imapd-2.1.9-r1-14610.log"  
  
mkdir:     /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/i686-linux/auto/Cyrus  
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------  
  
Markus

[Comment 1 Michael Cummings (RETIRED) 2002-09-12 20:12:27 UTC]

Markus,

My apologies. I had meant to post the corrected ebuild for this once the new
perl MakeMaker was in place. I am posting a masked copy now for your testing. It
should appear in your portage tree after an rsync (given time for mirror
filtering) and will be masked. You will need to unmask it in order to test the
installation.

[Comment 2 Michael Cummings (RETIRED) 2002-09-19 17:32:20 UTC]

Is this working for you now?

[Comment 3 Markus Wagner 2002-09-24 11:50:33 UTC]

Hi!  Sorry for the delay! Unfortunately it's still not working. There exists the same sandbox problem with the ebuild from 16/09 - 20:50.  Markus 

[Comment 4 Michael Cummings (RETIRED) 2002-09-24 13:20:11 UTC]

Not to be a pain, but did you emerge rsync prior to retrying (have to ask, it's
in the dev docs somewhere)?

[Comment 5 Michael Cummings (RETIRED) 2002-09-24 13:21:08 UTC]

If so (forgot to add this), try manually emerging dev-perl/ExtUtils-MakeMaker -
that should fix your problems (and should have been installed by the eclass on
its first invocation - working out why it didn't now).

[Comment 6 Michael Cummings (RETIRED) 2002-09-30 17:27:07 UTC]

Markus,

Many apologies. My corrected ebuild was .5-r2 - I failed to notice that .9 was
out. .9-r1 was just commited with the fix.

[Comment 7 Markus Wagner 2002-10-01 05:50:07 UTC]

Thanks, Michael! It works fine now!  Markus