Bug 77397 – games-arcade/stepmania-3.9_rc2 fails to compile

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Jonathan Smith (RETIRED) 2005-01-10 10:44:40 UTC]

crypto51/pubkey.h:403: error: `Lookup' undeclared (first use this function)
make[2]: *** [CryptManager.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make[2]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/stepmania-3.9_rc2/work/StepMania-3.9-rc2a-src/src'
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/stepmania-3.9_rc2/work/StepMania-3.9-rc2a-src/src'
make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1

!!! ERROR: games-arcade/stepmania-3.9_rc2 failed.
!!! Function src_compile, Line 52, Exitcode 2
!!! Make failed
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, NOT this status message.

__________________________________________________________________--

Portage 2.0.51-r8 (default-linux/x86/2004.2, gcc-3.4.3, glibc-2.3.4.20041102-r0, 2.6.10 i686)
=================================================================
System uname: 2.6.10 i686 Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 2.00GHz
Gentoo Base System version 1.6.8
Python:              dev-lang/python-2.3.4 [2.3.4 (#1, Jan 10 2005, 05:32:54)]
ccache version 2.3 [enabled]
dev-lang/python:     2.3.4
sys-devel/autoconf:  2.59-r6, 2.13
sys-devel/automake:  1.7.9, 1.9.3, 1.8.5-r2, 1.4_p6, 1.5, 1.6.3
sys-devel/binutils:  2.15.92.0.2-r1, 2.15.92.0.2-r2
sys-devel/libtool:   1.5.10-r2
virtual/os-headers:  2.4.22
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86 ~x86"
AUTOCLEAN="yes"
CFLAGS="-O2 -march=i686 -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe"
CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/kde/2/share/config /usr/kde/3.3/env /usr/kde/3.3/share/config /usr/kde/3.3/shutdown /usr/kde/3/share/config /usr/lib/X11/xkb /usr/lib/mozilla/defaults/pref /usr/share/config /usr/share/texmf/dvipdfm/config/ /usr/share/texmf/dvips/config/ /usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/config/ /usr/share/texmf/tex/platex/config/ /usr/share/texmf/xdvi/ /var/qmail/alias /var/qmail/control"
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/gconf /etc/terminfo /etc/env.d"
CXXFLAGS="-O2 -march=i686 -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe"
DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles"
FEATURES="autoaddcvs autoconfig ccache distlocks sandbox sfperms"
GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://distfiles.gentoo.org http://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/distributions/gentoo"
LDFLAGS=""
MAKEOPTS="-j2"
PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages"
PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp"
PORTDIR="/usr/portage"
PORTDIR_OVERLAY=""
SYNC="rsync://rsync.us.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage"
USE="x86 X aalib acl acpi aim alsa apache2 apm arts avi berkdb bitmap-fonts cdr crypt cups dba doc dvd encode esd fam flac fluxbox foomaticdb fortran ftp gd gd-external gdbm gif gpm gtk gtk2 icq imagemagick imap imlib java jikes jpeg junit libwww mad mbox mikmod mmx mmx2 motif mozilla mpeg mysql ncurses nls oggvorbis opengl pam pcmcia pdflib perl php png posix postgres python qt quicktime readline samba scanner sdl slang snmp spell sse sse2 ssl svga tcltk tcpd tetex tiff truetype udev usb vim xml2 xmms xprint xv xvid zlib"

[Comment 1 Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) 2005-01-10 11:57:46 UTC]

Jonathan: A games is not system critical. That's not a blocker.

[Comment 2 Jonathan Smith (RETIRED) 2005-01-10 12:18:59 UTC]

perhaps i misunderstood the ranking system then. i thought that the scale refered to the ability to use/test the specified package or problem. in this case, the lack of ability to compile blocks the testing/use of the package. so does the scale refer to the ability to use the entire system?

*changed to "normal"

[Comment 3 Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED) 2005-01-10 12:24:49 UTC]

The scale refers to the entire system.  Honestly, there's no point for anyone other than a developer to ever change the priority, unless you're lowering it.  We tend to make up our own priorities internally.

After all, if you are one person having one problem with a game, and I also maintain a package with a bug affecting hundreds of users, guess which will get priority, no matter what the "Severity" says?  Because of that, the severity really has zero meaning (especially for the Games team) except in the downward direction.

[Comment 4 Jonathan Smith (RETIRED) 2005-01-10 12:34:07 UTC]

well, thanks for the info. i shall not bother with it from now on, especially to look like a n00b by placing it WAY too high

[Comment 5 Warp Zero (RETIRED) 2005-01-10 21:40:24 UTC]

I can't reproduce this personally... anyone else?

[Comment 6 Mikael Svantesson 2005-01-23 09:10:29 UTC]

This error is because you use GCC 3.4.3, switch to 3.3.4 and it will compile just fine. :)

http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1064314&group_id=37892&atid=421366

[Comment 7 Warp Zero (RETIRED) 2005-03-24 15:24:15 UTC]

Doesn't look like there's much I can do about this... upstream is working on it...

[Comment 8 Jonathan Smith (RETIRED) 2005-06-03 21:27:58 UTC]

rc3 is out, and it seems to work. closing