Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 768858 - =dev-lang/erlang-23.2.1 stabilization
Summary: =dev-lang/erlang-23.2.1 stabilization
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Stabilization (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Sergei Trofimovich (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: STABLEREQ
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2021-02-05 10:10 UTC by Sergei Trofimovich (RETIRED)
Modified: 2021-02-12 13:46 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
dev-lang/erlang-23.2.1
Runtime testing required: No
nattka: sanity-check+

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Sergei Trofimovich (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2021-02-05 10:10:56 UTC 
In tree for 30 days. Let's stabilize =dev-lang/erlang-23.2.1 for:
    amd64 ppc ppc64 sparc x86
Comment 1 Sam James archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2021-02-05 10:13:31 UTC 
Duplicate of bug 765796 right? (which we can’t yet move forward with)
Comment 2 Sergei Trofimovich (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2021-02-05 10:32:00 UTC 
No, it should not be directly related.

I personally don't plan to backport security fixes to older erlang branches. That means removal (or masking) of vulnerable erlang versions would require porting all revdeps to newer version. I think we only have rabbitmq-server left (bug #755236). We are not there yet.

But rabbitmq-server should not block stabilization of newer erlang versions if they are ready.
Comment 3 Sam James archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2021-02-05 10:39:09 UTC 
(In reply to Sergei Trofimovich from comment #2)
> No, it should not be directly related.
> 
> I personally don't plan to backport security fixes to older erlang branches.
> That means removal (or masking) of vulnerable erlang versions would require
> porting all revdeps to newer version. I think we only have rabbitmq-server
> left (bug #755236). We are not there yet.
> 
> But rabbitmq-server should not block stabilization of newer erlang versions
> if they are ready.

We usually do stabilisation in the same bug, but cleanup would then be blocked on sorting out revdeps. But I'll just block the bug on this one
Comment 4 Sam James archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2021-02-05 10:42:16 UTC 
ppc64 done
Comment 5 Sam James archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2021-02-05 12:32:01 UTC 
amd64 done
Comment 6 Sam James archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2021-02-05 15:26:06 UTC 
x86 done
Comment 7 Sam James archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2021-02-05 15:26:39 UTC 
sparc done
Comment 8 Sam James archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2021-02-12 13:46:29 UTC 
ppc done

all arches done