Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 76598 - dev-util/indent-2.2.9-r2 fails to patch itself
Summary: dev-util/indent-2.2.9-r2 fails to patch itself
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Development (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal
Assignee: SpanKY
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
: 76604 76608 76634 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-01-03 22:00 UTC by Paul Forgey
Modified: 2005-01-04 08:16 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Paul Forgey 2005-01-03 22:00:18 UTC
Calculating world dependencies ...done!
>>> emerge (1 of 1) dev-util/indent-2.2.9-r2 to /
>>> md5 src_uri ;-) indent-2.2.9.tar.gz
>>> Unpacking source...
>>> Unpacking indent-2.2.9.tar.gz to /var/tmp/portage/indent-2.2.9-r2/work
 * Applying 2.2.9-deb-gentoo.patch ...

 * Failed Patch: 2.2.9-deb-gentoo.patch!
 *
 * Include in your bugreport the contents of:
 *
 *   /var/tmp/portage/indent-2.2.9-r2/temp/2.2.9-deb-gentoo.patch-1331.out


!!! ERROR: dev-util/indent-2.2.9-r2 failed.
!!! Function epatch, Line 410, Exitcode 0
!!! Failed Patch: 2.2.9-deb-gentoo.patch!
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, NOT this status message.


Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
emerge indent



Contents of
/var/tmp/portage/indent-2.2.9-r2/temp/2.2.9-deb-gentoo.patch-1331.out follow
this output

Portage 2.0.51-r3 (default-linux/x86/2004.0, gcc-3.3.4, glibc-2.3.4.20040808-r1,
 2.4.26-gentoo-r14 i686)
=================================================================
System uname: 2.4.26-gentoo-r14 i686 Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.40GHz
Gentoo Base System version 1.4.16
distcc 2.16 i686-pc-linux-gnu (protocols 1 and 2) (default port 3632) [disabled]
Autoconf: sys-devel/autoconf-2.59-r5
Automake: sys-devel/automake-1.8.5-r1
Binutils: sys-devel/binutils-2.15.90.0.1.1-r3
Headers:  sys-kernel/linux-headers-2.4.19-r1,sys-kernel/linux-headers-2.4.21-r1
Libtools: sys-devel/libtool-1.5.2-r7
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86"
AUTOCLEAN="yes"
CFLAGS="-march=pentium3 -O3 -pipe"
CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
COMPILER=""
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xkb /usr/kde/2/share/config /usr/kde/3/s
hare/config /usr/share/config /var/bind /var/qmail/control"
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/gconf /etc/terminfo /etc/env.d"
CXXFLAGS="-march=pentium3 -O3 -pipe"
DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles"
FEATURES="autoaddcvs autoconfig ccache distlocks sandbox sfperms"
GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://gentoo.osuosl.org http://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/dis
tributions/gentoo"
MAKEOPTS="-j5"
PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages"
PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp"
PORTDIR="/usr/portage"
PORTDIR_OVERLAY=""
SYNC="rsync://rsync.namerica.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage"
USE="x86 X acl acpi apm arts avi berkdb bitmap-fonts crypt cups curl encode esd
fam foomaticdb fortran gdbm gif gnome gpm gtk gtk2 imlib innodb ipv6 jpeg kde ld
ap libwww mad mikmod mmx motif mpeg mysql ncurses nls oggvorbis opengl oss pam p
dflib perl png python qt quicktime readline samba sdl slang spell ssl svga tcpd
tiff truetype xml2 xmms xv zlib"

***** 2.2.9-deb-gentoo.patch *****

==================================

PATCH COMMAND:  patch -p0 -g0 < /usr/portage/dev-util/indent/files/2.2.9-deb-gen
too.patch

==================================
can't find file to patch at input line 8
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|This patch is mostly from the debian indent_2.2.9-6.diff.
|
|Also added a patch to check usage of `texinfo2man`.
|http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71690
|
|--- indent-2.2.9.orig/man/texinfo2man.c
|+++ indent-2.2.9/man/texinfo2man.c
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
3 out of 3 hunks ignored
can't find file to patch at input line 40
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- indent-2.2.9.orig/src/output.c
|+++ indent-2.2.9/src/output.c
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
2 out of 2 hunks ignored
can't find file to patch at input line 62
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- indent-2.2.9.orig/src/indent.h
|+++ indent-2.2.9/src/indent.h
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
can't find file to patch at input line 73
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- indent-2.2.9.orig/src/indent.c
|+++ indent-2.2.9/src/indent.c
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
2 out of 2 hunks ignored
can't find file to patch at input line 94
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- indent-2.2.9.orig/src/comments.c
|+++ indent-2.2.9/src/comments.c
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
can't find file to patch at input line 104
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- indent-2.2.9.orig/src/output.h
|+++ indent-2.2.9/src/output.h
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
can't find file to patch at input line 115
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- texinfo2man.c.orig 2002-01-17 14:28:51.000000000 -0500
|+++ texinfo2man.c      2005-01-03 22:16:21.510887200 -0500
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
2 out of 2 hunks ignored
==================================

PATCH COMMAND:  patch -p1 -g0 < /usr/portage/dev-util/indent/files/2.2.9-deb-gen
too.patch

==================================
patching file man/texinfo2man.c
patching file src/output.c
patching file src/indent.h
patching file src/indent.c
patching file src/comments.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 20 with fuzz 2.
patching file src/output.h
missing header for unified diff at line 115 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 115
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- texinfo2man.c.orig 2002-01-17 14:28:51.000000000 -0500
|+++ texinfo2man.c      2005-01-03 22:16:21.510887200 -0500
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
2 out of 2 hunks ignored
==================================

PATCH COMMAND:  patch -p2 -g0 < /usr/portage/dev-util/indent/files/2.2.9-deb-gen
too.patch

==================================
can't find file to patch at input line 8
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|This patch is mostly from the debian indent_2.2.9-6.diff.
|
|Also added a patch to check usage of `texinfo2man`.
|http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71690
|
|--- indent-2.2.9.orig/man/texinfo2man.c
|+++ indent-2.2.9/man/texinfo2man.c
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
3 out of 3 hunks ignored
can't find file to patch at input line 40
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- indent-2.2.9.orig/src/output.c
|+++ indent-2.2.9/src/output.c
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
2 out of 2 hunks ignored
can't find file to patch at input line 62
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- indent-2.2.9.orig/src/indent.h
|+++ indent-2.2.9/src/indent.h
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
can't find file to patch at input line 73
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- indent-2.2.9.orig/src/indent.c
|+++ indent-2.2.9/src/indent.c
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
2 out of 2 hunks ignored
can't find file to patch at input line 94
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- indent-2.2.9.orig/src/comments.c
|+++ indent-2.2.9/src/comments.c
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
can't find file to patch at input line 104
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- indent-2.2.9.orig/src/output.h
|+++ indent-2.2.9/src/output.h
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
missing header for unified diff at line 115 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 115
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- texinfo2man.c.orig 2002-01-17 14:28:51.000000000 -0500
|+++ texinfo2man.c      2005-01-03 22:16:21.510887200 -0500
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
2 out of 2 hunks ignored
==================================

PATCH COMMAND:  patch -p3 -g0 < /usr/portage/dev-util/indent/files/2.2.9-deb-gen
too.patch

==================================
missing header for unified diff at line 8 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 8
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|This patch is mostly from the debian indent_2.2.9-6.diff.
|
|Also added a patch to check usage of `texinfo2man`.
|http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71690
|
|--- indent-2.2.9.orig/man/texinfo2man.c
|+++ indent-2.2.9/man/texinfo2man.c
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
3 out of 3 hunks ignored
missing header for unified diff at line 40 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 40
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- indent-2.2.9.orig/src/output.c
|+++ indent-2.2.9/src/output.c
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
2 out of 2 hunks ignored
missing header for unified diff at line 62 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 62
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- indent-2.2.9.orig/src/indent.h
|+++ indent-2.2.9/src/indent.h
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
missing header for unified diff at line 73 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 73
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- indent-2.2.9.orig/src/indent.c
|+++ indent-2.2.9/src/indent.c
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
2 out of 2 hunks ignored
missing header for unified diff at line 94 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 94
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- indent-2.2.9.orig/src/comments.c
|+++ indent-2.2.9/src/comments.c
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
missing header for unified diff at line 104 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 104
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- indent-2.2.9.orig/src/output.h
|+++ indent-2.2.9/src/output.h
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
missing header for unified diff at line 115 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 115
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- texinfo2man.c.orig 2002-01-17 14:28:51.000000000 -0500
|+++ texinfo2man.c      2005-01-03 22:16:21.510887200 -0500
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
2 out of 2 hunks ignored
==================================

PATCH COMMAND:  patch -p4 -g0 < /usr/portage/dev-util/indent/files/2.2.9-deb-gen
too.patch

==================================
missing header for unified diff at line 8 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 8
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|This patch is mostly from the debian indent_2.2.9-6.diff.
|
|Also added a patch to check usage of `texinfo2man`.
|http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71690
|
|--- indent-2.2.9.orig/man/texinfo2man.c
|+++ indent-2.2.9/man/texinfo2man.c
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
3 out of 3 hunks ignored
missing header for unified diff at line 40 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 40
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- indent-2.2.9.orig/src/output.c
|+++ indent-2.2.9/src/output.c
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
2 out of 2 hunks ignored
missing header for unified diff at line 62 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 62
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- indent-2.2.9.orig/src/output.c
|+++ indent-2.2.9/src/output.c
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
2 out of 2 hunks ignored
missing header for unified diff at line 62 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 62
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- indent-2.2.9.orig/src/indent.h
|+++ indent-2.2.9/src/indent.h
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
missing header for unified diff at line 73 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 73
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- indent-2.2.9.orig/src/indent.c
|+++ indent-2.2.9/src/indent.c
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
2 out of 2 hunks ignored
missing header for unified diff at line 94 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 94
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- indent-2.2.9.orig/src/comments.c
|+++ indent-2.2.9/src/comments.c
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
missing header for unified diff at line 104 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 104
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- indent-2.2.9.orig/src/output.h
|+++ indent-2.2.9/src/output.h
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
missing header for unified diff at line 115 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 115
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- texinfo2man.c.orig 2002-01-17 14:28:51.000000000 -0500
|+++ texinfo2man.c      2005-01-03 22:16:21.510887200 -0500
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
2 out of 2 hunks ignored
Comment 1 Steve B. 2005-01-03 22:36:56 UTC
I can confirm this. It happened to me as well. Below is some output relevant to my setup.  It doesn't *appear*  hard to fix.  If I have time I will look at the ebuild and attempt a fix if nobody gets to it first.

=== System Info ===
built via 2004.3
NPTL and GCC 3.4

=== emerge info ===
linux/x86/2004.3, gcc-3.4.3, glibc-2.3.4.20041102-r0, 2.6.9-nitro4 i686)
=================================================================
System uname: 2.6.9-nitro4 i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1800+
Gentoo Base System version 1.4.16
Autoconf: sys-devel/autoconf-2.59-r5
Automake: sys-devel/automake-1.8.5-r1
Binutils: sys-devel/binutils-2.15.90.0.1.1-r3
Headers:  sys-kernel/linux26-headers-2.6.8.1-r1
Libtools: sys-devel/libtool-1.5.2-r7
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86"
AUTOCLEAN="yes"
CFLAGS="-O3 -march=athlon-xp -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer"
CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
COMPILER=""
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xkb /usr/kde/2/share/config /usr/kde/3.3/env /usr/kde/3.3/share/config /usr/kde/3.3/shutdown /usr/kde/3/share/config /usr/lib/mozilla/defaults/pref /usr/share/config /var/qmail/control"
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/gconf /etc/terminfo /etc/env.d"
CXXFLAGS="-O3 -march=athlon-xp -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer"
DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles"
FEATURES="autoaddcvs autoconfig ccache ccahce digest distlocks sandbox sfperms strict userpriv"
GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://gentoo.gg3.net/ ftp://gg3.net/pub/linux/gentoo/ ftp://ftp.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp/GENTOO ftp://mirror.averse.net/pub/gentoo"
MAKEOPTS="-j2"
PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages"
PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp"
PORTDIR="/usr/portage"
PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/local/portage"
SYNC="rsync://rsync.asia.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage"
USE="x86 X acl acpi aim alsa apache2 apm arts avi bash-completion bcmath berkdb bidi bitmap-fonts bzlib cdr cjk crypt cups curl dga directfb divx4linux dvd dvdr encode esd evo fam fbcon fdftk flac flash foomaticdb fortran gd gdbm gif gnome gpm gstreamer gtk gtk2 gtkhtml icq imagemagick imap imlib innodb ipv4 java jikes joystick jpeg libwww mad maildir mhash mikmod mime ming mmx mng motif mozilla mpeg mpi msn mysql mysqli ncurses netboot nls nptl oggvorbis openal opengl oscar oss pam pcre pdflib perl php png posix python qt quicktime readline recode sdl session shared sharedmem simplexml slang sndfile soap spell spl sqlite ssl svga tcpd tiff tokenizer truetype unicode usb wxwindows xml xml2 xmms xpm xv xvid yahoo zlib"

==== Patch Output ===
***** 2.2.9-deb-gentoo.patch *****

==================================

PATCH COMMAND:  patch -p0 -g0 < /usr/portage/dev-util/indent/files/2.2.9-deb-gentoo.patch

==================================
can't find file to patch at input line 8
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|This patch is mostly from the debian indent_2.2.9-6.diff.
|
|Also added a patch to check usage of `texinfo2man`.
|http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71690
|
|--- indent-2.2.9.orig/man/texinfo2man.c
|+++ indent-2.2.9/man/texinfo2man.c
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
3 out of 3 hunks ignored
can't find file to patch at input line 40
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- indent-2.2.9.orig/src/output.c
|+++ indent-2.2.9/src/output.c
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
2 out of 2 hunks ignored
can't find file to patch at input line 62
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- indent-2.2.9.orig/src/indent.h
|+++ indent-2.2.9/src/indent.h
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
can't find file to patch at input line 73
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- indent-2.2.9.orig/src/indent.c
|+++ indent-2.2.9/src/indent.c
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
2 out of 2 hunks ignored
can't find file to patch at input line 94
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- indent-2.2.9.orig/src/comments.c
|+++ indent-2.2.9/src/comments.c
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
can't find file to patch at input line 104
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- indent-2.2.9.orig/src/output.h
|+++ indent-2.2.9/src/output.h
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
can't find file to patch at input line 115
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- texinfo2man.c.orig	2002-01-17 14:28:51.000000000 -0500
|+++ texinfo2man.c	2005-01-03 22:16:21.510887200 -0500
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
2 out of 2 hunks ignored
==================================

PATCH COMMAND:  patch -p1 -g0 < /usr/portage/dev-util/indent/files/2.2.9-deb-gentoo.patch

==================================
patching file man/texinfo2man.c
patching file src/output.c
patching file src/indent.h
patching file src/indent.c
patching file src/comments.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 20 with fuzz 2.
patching file src/output.h
missing header for unified diff at line 115 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 115
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- texinfo2man.c.orig	2002-01-17 14:28:51.000000000 -0500
|+++ texinfo2man.c	2005-01-03 22:16:21.510887200 -0500
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
2 out of 2 hunks ignored
==================================

PATCH COMMAND:  patch -p2 -g0 < /usr/portage/dev-util/indent/files/2.2.9-deb-gentoo.patch

==================================
can't find file to patch at input line 8
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|This patch is mostly from the debian indent_2.2.9-6.diff.
|
|Also added a patch to check usage of `texinfo2man`.
|http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71690
|
|--- indent-2.2.9.orig/man/texinfo2man.c
|+++ indent-2.2.9/man/texinfo2man.c
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
3 out of 3 hunks ignored
can't find file to patch at input line 40
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- indent-2.2.9.orig/src/output.c
|+++ indent-2.2.9/src/output.c
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
2 out of 2 hunks ignored
can't find file to patch at input line 62
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- indent-2.2.9.orig/src/indent.h
|+++ indent-2.2.9/src/indent.h
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
can't find file to patch at input line 73
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- indent-2.2.9.orig/src/indent.c
|+++ indent-2.2.9/src/indent.c
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
2 out of 2 hunks ignored
can't find file to patch at input line 94
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- indent-2.2.9.orig/src/comments.c
|+++ indent-2.2.9/src/comments.c
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
can't find file to patch at input line 104
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- indent-2.2.9.orig/src/output.h
|+++ indent-2.2.9/src/output.h
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
missing header for unified diff at line 115 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 115
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- texinfo2man.c.orig	2002-01-17 14:28:51.000000000 -0500
|+++ texinfo2man.c	2005-01-03 22:16:21.510887200 -0500
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
2 out of 2 hunks ignored
==================================

PATCH COMMAND:  patch -p3 -g0 < /usr/portage/dev-util/indent/files/2.2.9-deb-gentoo.patch

==================================
missing header for unified diff at line 8 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 8
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|This patch is mostly from the debian indent_2.2.9-6.diff.
|
|Also added a patch to check usage of `texinfo2man`.
|http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71690
|
|--- indent-2.2.9.orig/man/texinfo2man.c
|+++ indent-2.2.9/man/texinfo2man.c
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
3 out of 3 hunks ignored
missing header for unified diff at line 40 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 40
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- indent-2.2.9.orig/src/output.c
|+++ indent-2.2.9/src/output.c
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
2 out of 2 hunks ignored
missing header for unified diff at line 62 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 62
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- indent-2.2.9.orig/src/indent.h
|+++ indent-2.2.9/src/indent.h
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
missing header for unified diff at line 73 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 73
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- indent-2.2.9.orig/src/indent.c
|+++ indent-2.2.9/src/indent.c
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
2 out of 2 hunks ignored
missing header for unified diff at line 94 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 94
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- indent-2.2.9.orig/src/comments.c
|+++ indent-2.2.9/src/comments.c
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
missing header for unified diff at line 104 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 104
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- indent-2.2.9.orig/src/output.h
|+++ indent-2.2.9/src/output.h
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
missing header for unified diff at line 115 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 115
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- texinfo2man.c.orig	2002-01-17 14:28:51.000000000 -0500
|+++ texinfo2man.c	2005-01-03 22:16:21.510887200 -0500
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
2 out of 2 hunks ignored
==================================

PATCH COMMAND:  patch -p4 -g0 < /usr/portage/dev-util/indent/files/2.2.9-deb-gentoo.patch

==================================
missing header for unified diff at line 8 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 8
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|This patch is mostly from the debian indent_2.2.9-6.diff.
|
|Also added a patch to check usage of `texinfo2man`.
|http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71690
|
|--- indent-2.2.9.orig/man/texinfo2man.c
|+++ indent-2.2.9/man/texinfo2man.c
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
3 out of 3 hunks ignored
missing header for unified diff at line 40 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 40
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- indent-2.2.9.orig/src/output.c
|+++ indent-2.2.9/src/output.c
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
2 out of 2 hunks ignored
missing header for unified diff at line 62 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 62
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- indent-2.2.9.orig/src/indent.h
|+++ indent-2.2.9/src/indent.h
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
missing header for unified diff at line 73 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 73
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- indent-2.2.9.orig/src/indent.c
|+++ indent-2.2.9/src/indent.c
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
2 out of 2 hunks ignored
missing header for unified diff at line 94 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 94
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- indent-2.2.9.orig/src/comments.c
|+++ indent-2.2.9/src/comments.c
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
missing header for unified diff at line 104 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 104
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- indent-2.2.9.orig/src/output.h
|+++ indent-2.2.9/src/output.h
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
missing header for unified diff at line 115 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 115
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- texinfo2man.c.orig	2002-01-17 14:28:51.000000000 -0500
|+++ texinfo2man.c	2005-01-03 22:16:21.510887200 -0500
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
2 out of 2 hunks ignored
Comment 2 Marek Wiecek 2005-01-03 23:11:19 UTC
Confirmed. I have the same situation.
Comment 3 Kenyon Ralph 2005-01-03 23:28:34 UTC
Yep, same thing here.
Comment 4 Mirko Froehlich 2005-01-03 23:33:52 UTC
Bump... Same here. I'm not reposting the patch output again, but here's my emerge --info in case it helps:

Portage 2.0.51-r3 (default-linux/amd64/2004.3, gcc-3.4.3, glibc-2.3.4.20040808-r1, 2.6.9-gentoo-r1 x86_64)
=================================================================
System uname: 2.6.9-gentoo-r1 x86_64 AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3000+
Gentoo Base System version 1.4.16
Autoconf: sys-devel/autoconf-2.59-r5
Automake: sys-devel/automake-1.8.5-r1
Binutils: sys-devel/binutils-2.15.90.0.1.1-r3
Headers:  sys-kernel/linux26-headers-2.6.8.1-r1
Libtools: sys-devel/libtool-1.5.2-r7
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="amd64"
AUTOCLEAN="yes"
CFLAGS="-O3 -march=athlon64 -fmessage-length=0 -funroll-all-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -falign-loops=2 -falign-jumps=2 -falign-functions=2"
CHOST="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu"
COMPILER=""
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xkb /usr/kde/2/share/config /usr/kde/3.3/env /usr/kde/3.3/share/config /usr/kde/3.3/shutdown /usr/kde/3/share/config /usr/lib/mozilla/defaults/pref /usr/share/config /usr/share/texmf/dvipdfm/config/ /usr/share/texmf/dvips/config/ /usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/config/ /usr/share/texmf/tex/platex/config/ /usr/share/texmf/xdvi/ /var/qmail/control"
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/gconf /etc/terminfo /etc/env.d"
CXXFLAGS="-march=athlon64 -O2 -pipe"
DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles"
FEATURES="autoaddcvs autoconfig ccache distlocks sandbox"
GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://gentoo.osuosl.org http://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/distributions/gentoo"
MAKEOPTS="-j2"
PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages"
PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp"
PORTDIR="/usr/portage"
PORTDIR_OVERLAY=""
SYNC="rsync://rsync.namerica.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage"
USE="X acpi alsa amd64 apache2 avi berkdb bitmap-fonts cdparanoia cdr crypt cups divx4linux doc esd f77 fam flac foomaticdb fortran gdbm gif gnome gpm gstreamer gtk gtk2 imap imlib ipv6 jack java jp2 jpeg junit ldap libwww lzw lzw-tiff motif mozilla mpeg multilib mysql ncurses nls oggvorbis opengl oss pam perl php png povray ppds python readline ruby samba scanner slang ssl tcltk tcpd tetex tiff truetype truetype-fonts type1-fonts unicode usb userlocales wifi xine xml xml2 xmms xpm xrandr xv xvid yahoo zlib"
Comment 5 David Klempner 2005-01-03 23:34:53 UTC
same here.
Comment 6 Kyle Hall 2005-01-04 00:00:29 UTC
Same here on amd64 system as well.
Comment 7 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2005-01-04 00:23:51 UTC
fixed in cvs
Comment 8 Toralf Förster gentoo-dev 2005-01-04 01:09:52 UTC
*** Bug 76604 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 9 Alexander Mieland 2005-01-04 06:06:52 UTC
*** Bug 76608 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 10 Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-01-04 08:16:46 UTC
*** Bug 76634 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***