Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 762745 - app-emulation/wine-vanilla-4.0.3 fails to compile with -fno-common
Summary: app-emulation/wine-vanilla-4.0.3 fails to compile with -fno-common
Status: RESOLVED TEST-REQUEST
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Wine Maintainers
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: -fno-common gcc-10-stable
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2020-12-31 07:49 UTC by Agostino Sarubbo
Modified: 2021-02-20 14:46 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
build.log (build.log,967.09 KB, text/plain)
2020-12-31 07:49 UTC, Agostino Sarubbo
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2020-12-31 07:49:46 UTC
https://blogs.gentoo.org/ago/2020/07/04/gentoo-tinderbox/

Issue: app-emulation/wine-vanilla-4.0.3 fails to compile with -fno-common.
Discovered on: amd64 (internal ref: tinderbox)

NOTE:
To reproduce this issue you may want to set CFLAGS="${CFLAGS} -fno-common" or compile it with gcc-10 that enables -fno-common by default.
Comment 1 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2020-12-31 07:49:49 UTC
Created attachment 680377 [details]
build.log

build log and emerge --info
Comment 2 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2020-12-31 07:49:52 UTC
Possible context of error(s):

x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-ld: chain.o:(.bss+0x0): multiple definition of `hInstance'; cert.o:(.bss+0x0): first defined here
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-ld: collectionstore.o:(.bss+0x0): multiple definition of `hInstance'; cert.o:(.bss+0x0): first defined here
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-ld: context.o:(.bss+0x0): multiple definition of `hInstance'; cert.o:(.bss+0x0): first defined here
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-ld: crl.o:(.bss+0x0): multiple definition of `hInstance'; cert.o:(.bss+0x0): first defined here
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-ld: ctl.o:(.bss+0x0): multiple definition of `hInstance'; cert.o:(.bss+0x0): first defined here
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-ld: decode.o:(.bss+0x0): multiple definition of `hInstance'; cert.o:(.bss+0x0): first defined here
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-ld: encode.o:(.bss+0x0): multiple definition of `hInstance'; cert.o:(.bss+0x0): first defined here
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-ld: filestore.o:(.bss+0x0): multiple definition of `hInstance'; cert.o:(.bss+0x0): first defined here
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-ld: main.o:(.bss+0x0): multiple definition of `hInstance'; cert.o:(.bss+0x0): first defined here
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-ld: msg.o:(.bss+0x0): multiple definition of `hInstance'; cert.o:(.bss+0x0): first defined here
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-ld: object.o:(.bss+0x0): multiple definition of `hInstance'; cert.o:(.bss+0x0): first defined here
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-ld: oid.o:(.bss+0x0): multiple definition of `hInstance'; cert.o:(.bss+0x0): first defined here
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-ld: proplist.o:(.bss+0x0): multiple definition of `hInstance'; cert.o:(.bss+0x0): first defined here
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-ld: provstore.o:(.bss+0x0): multiple definition of `hInstance'; cert.o:(.bss+0x0): first defined here
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-ld: regstore.o:(.bss+0x0): multiple definition of `hInstance'; cert.o:(.bss+0x0): first defined here
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-ld: rootstore.o:(.bss+0x0): multiple definition of `hInstance'; cert.o:(.bss+0x0): first defined here
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-ld: serialize.o:(.bss+0x0): multiple definition of `hInstance'; cert.o:(.bss+0x0): first defined here
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-ld: sip.o:(.bss+0x0): multiple definition of `hInstance'; cert.o:(.bss+0x0): first defined here
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-ld: store.o:(.bss+0x18): multiple definition of `hInstance'; cert.o:(.bss+0x0): first defined here
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-ld: str.o:(.bss+0x0): multiple definition of `hInstance'; cert.o:(.bss+0x0): first defined here
Comment 3 Nick Sarnie gentoo-dev 2021-01-15 05:14:42 UTC
Is this still reproducible?
Comment 4 Jakov Smolić archtester gentoo-dev 2021-02-20 14:46:28 UTC
5.0.2 builds fine for me. Please reopen if reproducible