Bug 759727 – dev-python/plotly: prefix rekeywording

• Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Sam James 2020-12-13 07:04:41 UTC]

Thanks.

[Comment 1 Aisha Tammy 2020-12-13 12:06:54 UTC]

Unfortunately, I cannot test :(

[Comment 2 Benda Xu 2020-12-22 11:12:42 UTC]

(In reply to Sam James from comment #0)
> Thanks.

Hi Sam, are you running a prefix-rpath system?  The prefix-standalone just use the ~amd64 and ~x86 keywords as usual.

[Comment 3 Sam James 2020-12-27 22:46:35 UTC]

(In reply to Benda Xu from comment #2)
> (In reply to Sam James from comment #0)
> > Thanks.
> 
> Hi Sam, are you running a prefix-rpath system?  The prefix-standalone just
> use the ~amd64 and ~x86 keywords as usual.

Hi Benda, I'm using ~x64-macos only right now (and ~arm64, so standalone).

I'm trying to get the keywords consistent (either dropped entirely or re-keyworded) for various packages. Should I just restore them for stuff like ~amd64-linux if they got dropped?

[Comment 4 Benda Xu 2021-01-06 15:19:22 UTC]

(In reply to Sam James from comment #3)
> (In reply to Benda Xu from comment #2)
> > (In reply to Sam James from comment #0)
> > > Thanks.
> > 
> > Hi Sam, are you running a prefix-rpath system?  The prefix-standalone just
> > use the ~amd64 and ~x86 keywords as usual.
> 
> Hi Benda, I'm using ~x64-macos only right now (and ~arm64, so standalone).
> 
> I'm trying to get the keywords consistent (either dropped entirely or
> re-keyworded) for various packages. Should I just restore them for stuff
> like ~amd64-linux if they got dropped?

I recommend drop ~amd64-linux keywords by default.

I maintain implicit keywords more actively and would like to phase out prefix-rpath on Linux.  Previously, haubi needed prefix-rpath for his business, and was taking charge of prefix-rpath on Linux.

[Comment 5 Fabian Groffen 2021-01-06 15:27:56 UTC]

no no no no no, rpath prefix cannot be phased out on Linux, I need it too (as would most people who'd have to do development on/for target platforms -- e.g. RHEL X)

[Comment 6 Fabian Groffen 2021-01-06 15:30:08 UTC]

(In reply to Fabian Groffen from comment #5)
> no no no no no, rpath prefix cannot be phased out on Linux, I need it too
> (as would most people who'd have to do development on/for target platforms
> -- e.g. RHEL X)

It is fine to drop the keywords for non-@system packages though if it's obvious the deps aren't met.

[Comment 7 Benda Xu 2021-01-15 11:33:10 UTC]

(In reply to Fabian Groffen from comment #5)
> no no no no no, rpath prefix cannot be phased out on Linux, I need it too
> (as would most people who'd have to do development on/for target platforms
> -- e.g. RHEL X)

Sorry I wasn't aware of it.  @Sam, Fabian has the final work on this issue.

[Comment 8 Fabian Groffen 2021-08-29 13:27:26 UTC]

drop the keywords