Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 75959 - mark 1.0.2 ipw2100 ebuild as stable on x86
Summary: mark 1.0.2 ipw2100 ebuild as stable on x86
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: x86 Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Mobile Herd (OBSOLETE)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-12-28 15:38 UTC by Georg Sauthoff
Modified: 2005-05-21 14:25 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Georg Sauthoff 2004-12-28 15:38:13 UTC
Hi,

since the ipw2100 developers fixed a lot of bugs between 0.56-r1 (currently marked as stable in gentoo) and 1.0.2 I suggest to mark 1.0.2 as stable.
I can't see any open bugs in gentoo bugzilla, which has something to do with 1.0.2. And I experienced some ipw2100 bugs with 0.56-r1 (repeated firmware loading at some conditions e.g.).

Regards
Georg Sauthoff

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Comment 1 Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-12-28 15:48:15 UTC
Georg: Policy is a testing period of ~30 days.
Comment 2 Henrik Brix Andersen 2004-12-28 16:10:24 UTC
The "repeated firmware loading" is actually needed for some configurations. There are lots of bug reports open for version newer than ipw2100-0.56 at the projects own bugzilla database, http://www.bughost.org.

Marking a package - or a specific version of a package - stable does not rely solely on the "no bugs open at bugs.gentoo.org for the last ~30 days". It also relies on upstream bug reports and general stability of the package/version.

Version 1.0.x will be marked stable when ready. Until then you are free to unmask it locally in /etc/portage/package.keywords.

Closing this bug report as LATER.
Comment 3 Georg Sauthoff 2004-12-28 17:29:38 UTC
> The "repeated firmware loading" is actually needed for some
> configurations.There are lots of bug reports open for version newer than

greater 10 times?

> ipw2100-0.56 at the projects own bugzilla database, http://www.bughost.org.

I guess 0.56 doesn't get any new reports because .tar users test against latest versions, if there are any, to get the latest bugfixes.

> Marking a package - or a specific version of a package - stable does not 
> rely solely on the "no bugs open at bugs.gentoo.org for the last ~30 days".

Sure.

> It also relies on upstream bug reports and general stability of the 
> package/version.

Of course.

BTW, I found 6 open bugs for 0.56 and 3 for 1.0.2 at http://www.bughost.org.

> Version 1.0.x will be marked stable when ready. Until then you are free to 

Yes, when it is ready.
Just a feedback:
For my setup: 0.56 very unstable, 1.0.2 stable for 10 days (no standby problems etc.)

> unmask it locally in /etc/portage/package.keywords.

The intention of my bug report was saving other gentoo users trouble with the current 'stable' ipw2100 0.56 ebuild.
Comment 4 Henrik Brix Andersen 2005-05-21 14:25:07 UTC
ipw2100-1.1.0 is x86.
Comment 5 Henrik Brix Andersen 2005-05-21 14:25:29 UTC
Closing as FIXED.