Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 74714 - zapata-1.0.1 fixed dependency on zaptel-1.0.1 ?
Summary: zapata-1.0.1 fixed dependency on zaptel-1.0.1 ?
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All All
: Normal trivial (vote)
Assignee: voip herd (OBSOLETE)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-12-16 19:20 UTC by Rajiv Aaron Manglani (RETIRED)
Modified: 2005-03-21 14:38 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Rajiv Aaron Manglani (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-12-16 19:20:00 UTC 
emerge -pv asterisk

Calculating dependencies ...done!
[ebuild  N    ] dev-libs/newt-0.50.35-r4  (-uclibc) 0 kB 
[ebuild  N    ] net-misc/zaptel-1.0.1  -devfs26 289 kB 
[ebuild  N    ] net-libs/zapata-1.0.1  72 kB 
[ebuild  N    ] net-misc/zaptel-1.0.2  -devfs26 307 kB 
[ebuild  N    ] net-misc/asterisk-1.0.2  +alsa -doc +gtk +mmx +mysql -pri -resperl (-uclibc) +zaptel 11,072 kB 


zapata-1.0.1 has:
DEPEND="virtual/libc
        =net-misc/zaptel-1.0.1"

so zaptel-1.0.1 is built, then zapata. zaptel-1.0.2 is then built and 1.0.1 is removed.

is this fixed version dependency in zapata intentional ?
Comment 1 Stefan Knoblich (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-12-18 11:50:23 UTC 
captain grep told me it's not needed anymore, so it's gonna get removed from asterisk's DEPENDS
Comment 2 Remco Barendse 2004-12-20 11:27:31 UTC 
You mean zapata is no longer required? The description that comes with zapata is not particularly helpful, I still do not have a clue what zapata adds "Library of additional telephony related functions".

Is it safe to remove zapata or did you mean that just the dependency has been obsoleted? This bug is annoying. Thx!
Comment 3 Stefan Knoblich (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-01-13 13:14:04 UTC 
asterisk-1.0 makefiles don't check for zapata presence, dropped the DEPEND line
Comment 4 witr 2005-03-21 14:38:04 UTC 
As of today, this hard version dependency still exists in the zapata ebuild.  If you need zapata for whatever reason, whether or not Asterisk needs it, should this hard version link be there?  I'm guessing not: I assume zapata can work with newer versions of Zaptel.

I have no clue if Asterisk needs zapata if you use a Zap interface (and thus are using Zaptel).  I'm testing that.