Shouldn't the 5.010 version of the acroread ebuild have been named 5.10 instead? I currently have acroread-5.09-r1 installed. When I do an emerge -p world, I get: [ebuild UD] app-text/acroread-5.010 [5.09-r1] Going from 5.09-r1 to 5.010 is a *downgrade*. I think the ebuild should have been named 5.1 instead of 5.010. Otherwise, pretty much just a minor nitpick. This is with version 2.0.51-r8 of portage (emerge).
This has been already fixed in cvs, it will be available in a few hours 16 Dec 2004; lanius@gentoo.org -acroread-5.010.ebuild, +acroread-5.10.ebuild: rename 5.010 to 5.10 because 5.010 < 5.09
Got it synced up here now too. Thanks.