Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 74108 - sendmail 8.12.11 will not use SSL on port 465
Summary: sendmail 8.12.11 will not use SSL on port 465
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All All
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Net-Mail Packages
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-12-11 09:00 UTC by Victor Mendoza
Modified: 2005-05-18 10:02 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
Adds "-D_FFR_SMTP_SSL" to the sendmail-8.12.11-r3.ebuild (sendmail-8.12.11-r3-r4.patch,595 bytes, patch)
2004-12-11 09:02 UTC, Victor Mendoza
Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Victor Mendoza 2004-12-11 09:00:05 UTC
Hi!

Please find attached sendmail-8.12.11-r3-r4.patch which modifies one line of the mail-mta/sendmail-8.12.11-r3.ebuild so that it will properly work with SSL.

Whithout this option sendmail-8.12.11 will not open an ssl connection on port 465, just a plain unencrypted one.

Thanks!

Victor
Comment 1 Victor Mendoza 2004-12-11 09:02:28 UTC
Created attachment 45742 [details, diff]
Adds "-D_FFR_SMTP_SSL" to the sendmail-8.12.11-r3.ebuild

Without this option sendmail-8.12.11 will not properly listen to SSL
connections on port 465.
Comment 2 Andrea Barisani (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-05-17 09:41:18 UTC
That option is no longer available in latest sendmail, just try using something
like the following declaration in your conf.

DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=465, Name=SSLMTA, M=s')dnl

It should work just fine.
Comment 3 Victor Mendoza 2005-05-18 00:54:06 UTC
Correct, but I don't think waiting until the problem was no longer relevant was
the best solution. Thanks anyway.
Comment 4 Andrea Barisani (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-05-18 01:00:41 UTC
We haven't "waited" on purpose, simply this bug was left behind and now
that we had the chance to review it the issue was invalid.
Comment 5 Victor Mendoza 2005-05-18 10:02:06 UTC
Sorry, didn't mean to lash out.
I really do appretiate your effort.
Thanks!