Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 7349 - ebuild: wolk-sources 3.6-rc1
Summary: ebuild: wolk-sources 3.6-rc1
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Joachim Blaabjerg (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2002-09-01 16:00 UTC by Per Wigren
Modified: 2002-12-09 13:08 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
sys-kernel/wolk-sources/wolk-sources-3.6_rc1.ebuild (wolk-sources-3.6_rc1.ebuild,2.74 KB, text/plain)
2002-09-01 16:01 UTC, Per Wigren
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Per Wigren 2002-09-01 16:00:18 UTC
An ebuild for the WOLK-kernel.. WOLK is short for Working Overloaded Linux  
Kernel.. It's LOADED with patches for performance, features and security! It's  
homepage is http://wolk.sourceforge.net  
  
I used the gentoo-sources ebuild as a template but modified it heavily... It  
should work with any future wolk-version as it includes it's own script to  
patch the kernel.. Just rename the ebuild! ;)  If the patch starts to be  
against some other version than 2.4.18, you have to change the  
"OKV=2.4.18"-line to the proper version though...
Comment 1 Per Wigren 2002-09-01 16:01:34 UTC
Created attachment 3588 [details]
sys-kernel/wolk-sources/wolk-sources-3.6_rc1.ebuild
Comment 2 Brandon Low (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2002-09-02 21:39:33 UTC
Styx, can you do me a favor and check you ebuild against the
lolo-sources-2.4.19.9_rc2 ebuild and see if yours has the same basic
functionality as that?
That is the model that kernel ebuilds WILL follow from now on.
Comment 3 Joachim Blaabjerg (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2002-09-03 00:46:27 UTC
Will do, reassigning so I don't forget.
Comment 4 Joachim Blaabjerg (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2002-12-09 13:08:24 UTC
I converted it to the new eclass scheme and committed 3.8 (masked for testing) 
today. The main reason for masking, is that I'm a bit worried about the versioning 
scheme. Does it ever start over again at 1.0? I'd like it if they included the kernel 
version number they based the patches on in every release name, but is that ever 
going to happen? Tips appreciated.