Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 7284 - Inheriting completely broken in portage 2.0.33
Summary: Inheriting completely broken in portage 2.0.33
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Portage Development
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Unclassified (show other bugs)
Hardware: x86 Linux
: Lowest critical (vote)
Assignee: Daniel Robbins (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
: 7302 7304 7308 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2002-08-31 02:20 UTC by Maurizio Disimino
Modified: 2011-10-30 22:18 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Maurizio Disimino 2002-08-31 02:20:28 UTC
sexybit kportage # emerge kportage
Calculating dependencies ...done!
>>> emerge app-admin/kportage-0.5 to /
>>> md5 ;-) kportage-0.5.tar.bz2
/usr/sbin/ebuild.sh: need-kde: command not found
>>> Unpacking source...
>>> Unpacking kportage-0.5.tar.bz2

/usr/portage/app-admin/kportage/kportage-0.5.ebuild: src_unpack aborted; exiting.

Caught signal 2
Killed

Same for knetload and mosfet-liquid-widgets
portage .33 - gentoo 1.4 (beta)?
Comment 1 Dan Armak (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2002-08-31 03:35:00 UTC
Confirmed. Portage .33 breaks _all_ eclass-using apps; the inheriting simply      
doesn't happen. This is due to the new code that makes inherit() conditional on    
$PORTAGE_RESTORE_ENV != 1. This doesn't work for some reason or other. I've   
disabled this code and made a portage-2.0.33_p1 to make things work for now (I   
haven't changed the internal portage version number because I wasn't sure how   
it'd react to a _p1 version).  
  
BTW the change to inherit() that broke it wasn't even in the porage changelog.  
Please tell whoever committed it (don't remember who it was, I think it wasn't  
you?) to be more careful...  
  
BTW there's lots of cvs-conflict and patch-reject files in the portage 
tarballs. You should prune them, it would make the tarballs smaller :-) 
Comment 2 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2002-08-31 23:16:05 UTC
*** Bug 7302 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2002-08-31 23:22:24 UTC
*** Bug 7304 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2002-08-31 23:24:50 UTC
*** Bug 7308 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Daniel Robbins (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2002-09-01 15:32:49 UTC
fixed in 2.0.34; thanks.