Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 719852 - [kde-overlay] kde-plasma/libksysguard-9999 does copy shared object files in install phase but does not merge them
Summary: [kde-overlay] kde-plasma/libksysguard-9999 does copy shared object files in i...
Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Overlays (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo KDE team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2020-04-27 22:33 UTC by jospezial
Modified: 2021-03-08 10:19 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
build.log (build.log,125.41 KB, text/plain)
2020-04-30 04:42 UTC, jospezial
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description jospezial 2020-04-27 22:33:38 UTC
since upstream commit in libksysguard git

https://github.com/KDE/libksysguard/commit/834de9a585c6509f934e9941a5369fed70e6b2c9

"Introduce ProcessDataModel"

emerge does copy shared object files in install phase but does not merge them.
Emerge reports no error.

This ends in dead links in
/usr/lib*/

ls -l /usr/lib64/libksgrd.so*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 27. Apr 23:40 /usr/lib64/libksgrd.so -> libksgrd.so.9
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 27. Apr 23:40 /usr/lib64/libksgrd.so.9 -> libksgrd.so.5.18.80



before that commit:
joerg@jlgentoo ~ $ ls -l /usr/lib64/libksgrd.so*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root     13 27. Apr 23:42 /usr/lib64/libksgrd.so -> libksgrd.so.8
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 105368 27. Apr 23:42 /usr/lib64/libksgrd.so.5.18.80
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root     19 27. Apr 23:42 /usr/lib64/libksgrd.so.8 -> libksgrd.so.5.18.80

Could be caused by the so.version change.

As I didn't find a fitting upstream bug and this survived in kde git for at least 13 days, I think this could be a Gentoo bug.
Comment 1 jospezial 2020-04-27 22:37:29 UTC
(In reply to jospezial from comment #0)
 
> As I didn't find a fitting upstream bug and this survived in kde git for at
> least 13 days, I think this could be a Gentoo bug.

As I didn't find a fitting upstream bug and this survived in the git for some weeks, I think this could be a Gentoo bug.
Comment 2 Andreas Sturmlechner gentoo-dev 2020-04-29 18:15:57 UTC
No build.log? This is not your first bug report.

I think you are seeing preserve-libs in action. Upstream soname changed but something installed depends on old soversion.
Comment 3 jospezial 2020-04-30 04:42:34 UTC
Created attachment 635260 [details]
build.log
Comment 4 jospezial 2020-04-30 05:26:32 UTC
There were no messages about preserved-libs after emerging.
This in build.log what I don't know what it means, why it didn't copy the new obj files but deletes the old ones:

>>> needed    obj /usr/lib64/libksgrd.so.5.18.80
>>> needed    sym /usr/lib64/libksgrd.so.8
>>> needed    obj /usr/lib64/libksignalplotter.so.5.18.80
>>> needed    sym /usr/lib64/libksignalplotter.so.8
>>> needed    obj /usr/lib64/libprocesscore.so.5.18.80
>>> needed    sym /usr/lib64/libprocesscore.so.8
>>> needed    obj /usr/lib64/libprocessui.so.5.18.80
>>> needed    sym /usr/lib64/libprocessui.so.8
>>> Safely unmerging already-installed instance...
>>> Original instance of package unmerged safely.

>>> kde-plasma/libksysguard-9999 merged.
>>> Regenerating /etc/ld.so.cache...
<<< !needed  obj /usr/lib64/libksgrd.so.5.18.80
<<< !needed  sym /usr/lib64/libksgrd.so.8
<<< !needed  obj /usr/lib64/libksignalplotter.so.5.18.80
<<< !needed  sym /usr/lib64/libksignalplotter.so.8
<<< !needed  obj /usr/lib64/libprocesscore.so.5.18.80
<<< !needed  sym /usr/lib64/libprocesscore.so.8
<<< !needed  obj /usr/lib64/libprocessui.so.5.18.80
<<< !needed  sym /usr/lib64/libprocessui.so.8


Uninstalled without messages about preserved-libs and a fresh merge worked correctly:

ls -l /usr/lib*/libksgrd.so*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root     13 30. Apr 06:45 /usr/lib64/libksgrd.so -> libksgrd.so.9
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 105368 30. Apr 06:45 /usr/lib64/libksgrd.so.5.18.80
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root     19 30. Apr 06:45 /usr/lib64/libksgrd.so.9 -> libksgrd.so.5.18.80

ls -l /usr/lib64/libprocess*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root     19 30. Apr 06:45 /usr/lib64/libprocesscore.so -> libprocesscore.so.9
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 266640 30. Apr 06:45 /usr/lib64/libprocesscore.so.5.18.80
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root     25 30. Apr 06:45 /usr/lib64/libprocesscore.so.9 -> libprocesscore.so.5.18.80
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root     17 30. Apr 06:45 /usr/lib64/libprocessui.so -> libprocessui.so.9
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 351584 30. Apr 06:45 /usr/lib64/libprocessui.so.5.18.80
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root     23 30. Apr 06:45 /usr/lib64/libprocessui.so.9 -> libprocessui.so.5.18.80

Let's see if this will help in future:
(not installed) dev-util/kdevelop: Add slot op on kde-plasma/libksysguard
kde-plasma/libksysguard: Add subslot

Should all packages that depend on libksysguard get a slot op?
These packages depend on libksysguard:
kde-plasma/ksysguard-9999 (>=kde-plasma/libksysguard-9999:5[-minimal(-)])
kde-plasma/plasma-desktop-9999 (>=kde-plasma/libksysguard-9999:5)
kde-plasma/plasma-workspace-9999 (>=kde-plasma/libksysguard-9999:5)
Comment 5 Andreas Sturmlechner gentoo-dev 2020-04-30 07:44:38 UTC
(In reply to jospezial from comment #4)
> There were no messages about preserved-libs after emerging.
There were likely no messages at the end because the same emerge also updated all relevant kde-plasma/* packages depending on libksysguard, thus there is no need for a slot operator.
Comment 6 Andreas Sturmlechner gentoo-dev 2020-04-30 07:53:19 UTC
I mean, a slot operator on dependencies within kde-plasma/* would only help you with live versions where it is likely a non-issue as seen here. ...and theoretically if someone mixed different major versions of libksysguard and other kde-plasma/*, then once in 5 years the subslot changes, but you're skrewed in different ways already if you mix different major kde-plasma/* packages.
Comment 7 jospezial 2021-03-08 07:46:12 UTC
It is happening now with kde-apps/libksane-9999
https://invent.kde.org/graphics/libksane/-/commit/66f2eb156e8ec52ee4787530ea5053eb1d7c5ebb
set SOVERSION

kde-misc/skanlite-9999 and kde-apps/kolourpaint-9999 fail:

CMake Error at /usr/lib64/cmake/KF5Sane/KF5SaneTargets.cmake:88 (message):
  The imported target "KF5::Sane" references the file
     "/usr/lib64/libKF5Sane.so.21.03.70"
  but this file does not exist.

ls -l /usr/lib64/libKF5Sane*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15  8. Mär 01:39 /usr/lib64/libKF5Sane.so -> libKF5Sane.so.5
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 22  8. Mär 01:39 /usr/lib64/libKF5Sane.so.5 -> libKF5Sane.so.21.03.70

I will test which files will be merged after unmerge kde-misc/skanlite-9999 and kde-apps/kolourpaint-9999.
Comment 8 jospezial 2021-03-08 08:17:38 UTC
After unmerging kde-misc/skanlite-9999 and kde-apps/kolourpaint-9999 all files will be merged.

ls -l /usr/lib64/libKF5Sane*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root     15  8. Mär 09:04 /usr/lib64/libKF5Sane.so -> libKF5Sane.so.5
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 341168  8. Mär 09:04 /usr/lib64/libKF5Sane.so.21.03.70
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root     22  8. Mär 09:04 /usr/lib64/libKF5Sane.so.5 -> libKF5Sane.so.21.03.70

This libs preserving is a bit strange and contra productive at this point.
More a sys-apps/portage bug.
Should I reopen,rename this an then reassigning to the portage people?
Comment 9 Andreas Sturmlechner gentoo-dev 2021-03-08 10:19:04 UTC
It happened because of an unintended soversion change from an upstream build system update, bug 772017.

If you ask me, it's a problem a live ebuild user should be able to deal with. But you can certainly raise it with portage proj.