Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 715004 - sys-devel/gcc-9.3.0 fails several tests on ppc64
Summary: sys-devel/gcc-9.3.0 fails several tests on ppc64
Status: RESOLVED OBSOLETE
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: PPC64 Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Toolchain Maintainers
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: TESTFAILURE
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2020-03-26 23:44 UTC by ernsteiswuerfel
Modified: 2022-06-26 20:25 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
build.log.xz (gcc-9.3.0:20200326-213436.log.xz,198.41 KB, application/x-xz)
2020-03-26 23:44 UTC, ernsteiswuerfel
Details
gcc-build-logs.tar.bz2 (gcc-build-logs.tar.bz2,424.46 KB, application/x-bzip)
2020-03-26 23:44 UTC, ernsteiswuerfel
Details
emerge --info (file_715004.txt,6.13 KB, text/plain)
2020-03-26 23:45 UTC, ernsteiswuerfel
Details
build.log.xz (9.3.0-r2, ppc64) (gcc-9.3.0-r2:20201221-013347.log.xz,214.04 KB, application/x-xz)
2020-12-21 08:59 UTC, ernsteiswuerfel
Details
build.log.xz (9.3.0-r2, ppc) (gcc-9.3.0-r2:20210404-183457.log.xz,187.88 KB, application/x-xz)
2021-04-04 21:16 UTC, ernsteiswuerfel
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description ernsteiswuerfel archtester 2020-03-26 23:44:07 UTC
Created attachment 626358 [details]
build.log.xz

[...]
Running /var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-9.3.0/work/gcc-9.3.0/gcc/testsuite/gcc.test-framework/test-framework.exp ...
skipping test framework tests, CHECK_TEST_FRAMEWORK is not defined

                === gcc Summary ===

# of expected passes            15092
# of unexpected failures        223
# of expected failures          17
# of unsupported tests          153
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-9.3.0/work/build/gcc/xgcc  version 9.3.0 (Gentoo 9.3.0 p1) 

make[3]: Leaving directory '/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-9.3.0/work/build/gcc'
make[2]: Leaving directory '/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-9.3.0/work/build/gcc'
make[1]: Target 'check-host' not remade because of errors.
make[1]: Leaving directory '/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-9.3.0/work/build'
make: *** [Makefile:2323: do-check] Error 2
make: Target 'check' not remade because of errors.
 * ERROR: sys-devel/gcc-9.3.0::gentoo failed (test phase):
 *   emake failed
Comment 1 ernsteiswuerfel archtester 2020-03-26 23:44:48 UTC
Created attachment 626360 [details]
gcc-build-logs.tar.bz2
Comment 2 ernsteiswuerfel archtester 2020-03-26 23:45:33 UTC
Created attachment 626362 [details]
emerge --info
Comment 3 ernsteiswuerfel archtester 2020-12-21 08:59:12 UTC
Created attachment 679062 [details]
build.log.xz (9.3.0-r2, ppc64)

9.3.0-r2 built with current toolchain seems quite an improvement regarding failure count.

[...]
skipping test framework tests, CHECK_TEST_FRAMEWORK is not defined

		=== gcc Summary ===

# of expected passes		12468
# of unexpected failures	13
# of expected failures		24
# of unsupported tests		284
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-9.3.0-r2/work/build/gcc/xgcc  version 9.3.0 (Gentoo 9.3.0-r2 p4)
Comment 4 ernsteiswuerfel archtester 2021-04-04 21:16:19 UTC
Created attachment 697614 [details]
build.log.xz (9.3.0-r2, ppc)

41 failures on ppc (vs. 13 on ppc64).

[...]
skipping test framework tests, CHECK_TEST_FRAMEWORK is not defined

                === gcc Summary ===

# of expected passes            2108
# of unexpected failures        41
# of unexpected successes       4
# of expected failures          15
# of unresolved testcases       1
# of unsupported tests          139
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-9.3.0-r2/work/build/gcc/xgcc  version 9.3.0 (Gentoo 9.3.0-r2 p4)
Comment 5 matoro archtester 2022-06-26 04:05:23 UTC
gcc 9 is masked now.  Do you want to retest with more recent versions and bring this forward, or drop it?
Comment 6 Sam James archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2022-06-26 06:52:01 UTC
(In reply to matoro from comment #5)
> gcc 9 is masked now.  Do you want to retest with more recent versions and
> bring this forward, or drop it?

Let's close.
Comment 7 Sam James archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2022-06-26 06:52:24 UTC
(In reply to Sam James from comment #6)
> (In reply to matoro from comment #5)
> > gcc 9 is masked now.  Do you want to retest with more recent versions and
> > bring this forward, or drop it?
> 
> Let's close.

... btw, this doesn't mean the bug was/is worthless: it's really helpful to have historical comparisons to know if things are getting worse/better, especially when stabling.