Hello all! I have gpdf 2.8.0 and ggv 2.8.0 installed. And I came across a pdf gpdf isn't able to display properly. I think in this case images tell more than words, so you might want to take a look at http://www-users.rwth-aachen.de/sebastian.kemper What do you think? Greetings Sebastian Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. emerge info Portage 2.0.51-r3 (default-x86-2004.2, gcc-3.3.4, glibc-2.3.4.20040808-r1, 2.6.9 i686) ================================================================= System uname: 2.6.9 i686 Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1400MHz Gentoo Base System version 1.4.16 distcc 2.16 i686-pc-linux-gnu (protocols 1 and 2) (default port 3632) [enabled] ccache version 2.3 [enabled] Autoconf: sys-devel/autoconf-2.59-r5 Automake: sys-devel/automake-1.8.5-r1 Binutils: sys-devel/binutils-2.14.90.0.8-r1 Headers: sys-kernel/linux26-headers-2.6.8.1 Libtools: sys-devel/libtool-1.5.2-r5 ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86" AUTOCLEAN="yes" CFLAGS="-O2 -march=pentium3 -msse2 -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe" CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu" COMPILER="" CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xkb /usr/kde/2/share/config /usr/kde/3/share/config /usr/lib/mozilla/defaults/pref /usr/share/config /usr/share/texmf/dvipdfm/config/ /usr/share/texmf/dvips/config/ /usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/config/ /usr/share/texmf/tex/platex/config/ /usr/share/texmf/xdvi/ /var/qmail/control"CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/gconf /etc/terminfo /etc/env.d" CXXFLAGS="-O2 -march=pentium3 -msse2 -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe" DISTDIR="/home/distfiles" FEATURES="autoaddcvs ccache distcc distlocks sandbox" GENTOO_MIRRORS="ftp://sunsite.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/pub/Linux/gentoo" MAKEOPTS="-j5" PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages" PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp" PORTDIR="/usr/portage" PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/local/portage" SYNC="rsync://rsync.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/gentoo-portage" USE="X bitmap-fonts crypt cups foomaticdb gnome gtk2 ithreads jpeg mmx moznocompose moznoirc ncurses nls png ppds readline spell sse sse2 ssl tetex truetype unicode x86 xprint zlib"
gpdf has some known limitations, one of them is not supporting type 3 fonts. It looks like that is the case here, but maybe somebody who knows more about fonts knows better.
Ah, thanks for the info! Sebastian
going to assume its a type3 fonts issue since its just a random pdf, closing for now. This is an issue that is suposed to be resolved in the 2.9/2.10 series.
k thanks! Sebastian
