Created attachment 612402 [details, diff] nettstamp-systypes.patch I have observed this recently while attempting to rebuild net-misc/linuxptp-2.0 on an up-to-date otherwise-stable amd64 system. According to a Debian bug I have found, this is related to changes made in glibc before release 2.28. Attaching a patch which fixes the problem. It is functionally the same as the one from the aforementioned Debian bug but adapted to work on 2.0 sources.
(In reply to Marek Szuba from comment #0) > Created attachment 612402 [details, diff] [details, diff] > nettstamp-systypes.patch > > I have observed this recently while attempting to rebuild > net-misc/linuxptp-2.0 on an up-to-date otherwise-stable amd64 system. > According to a Debian bug I have found, this is related to changes made in > glibc before release 2.28. > > Attaching a patch which fixes the problem. It is functionally the same as > the one from the aforementioned Debian bug but adapted to work on 2.0 > sources. As <glibc-2.30-r8 is package masked, do you think we still need these patches? Otherwise I will close the bug.
