Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 70259 - kismet 2004.10.1 puts config files in /etc instead of /etc/kismet
Summary: kismet 2004.10.1 puts config files in /etc instead of /etc/kismet
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal
Assignee: Mobile Herd (OBSOLETE)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-11-06 05:38 UTC by jochen
Modified: 2004-12-31 10:52 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description jochen 2004-11-06 05:38:32 UTC
Upgraded my kismet and wondered why my config was lost. Checking the /etc dir I figured the new ebuild installed the config files into /etc instead of /etc/kismet

now this is quite messy and should be reverted if possible

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Comment 1 Joe McCann (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-11-06 06:06:37 UTC
This seems to be a non issue, feel free to change status if not so

from the ebuild:

einfo "Please notice that the config file location has changed from"
     einfo "/etc/kismet to /etc/"
     einfo ""
     einfo "For usage instructions please see"
     einfo "/usr/share/doc/${PF}/README.gz"
Comment 2 jochen 2004-11-07 12:20:02 UTC
let me please reopen that one.

the config files include lists of AP/wlan card mac prefixes etc which don't have kismet specific names. If it was a single file like /etc/kismet.conf I think it's ok to have this file in /etc

but since we have half a dozend files including those prefix lists etc, I don't think it's a good idea to throw them in /etc
Comment 3 Henrik Brix Andersen 2004-11-07 15:13:28 UTC
The /etc/ location was chosen since it's the package default location. Unless there is a clash with another application already in portage I really don't see the problem.
Comment 4 jochen 2004-11-08 02:22:12 UTC
no, i don't think the files collide with any other ebuild

still, I think it's a bad idea to flood /etc with to many app specific files

anyway, feel free to close the bug again
Comment 5 Henrik Brix Andersen 2004-11-08 04:58:17 UTC
Re-closing as INVALID.
Comment 6 Malte S. Stretz 2004-12-25 13:57:19 UTC
Just wanted to add a "vote" for a sysconfdir=/etc/kismet.  As Jochen noted is it quite messy the way it is now.

Actually, ap_manuf and client_manuf should probably go to /usr/share/kismet and the *.conf to /etc/kismet.  Just because the original tar ball is a mess it doesn't mean that the software packaged for Gentoo should be, too :)
Comment 7 Henrik Brix Andersen 2004-12-26 12:18:10 UTC
This bug is closed as INVALID - and it will stay that way. I see no reason to divert from the package defaults.
Comment 8 jochen 2004-12-31 10:52:46 UTC
Let me give you some:

- the package defaults are wrong
- the package defaults do not fit gentoo
- the package defaults are suboptimal

there are so many things that get changed for gentoo, why not this one too?

It still gives me the creeps each time I ls /etc and see the ap_list .. files fly by..

happy new year btw :)

please reconsider this bug!