Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 698420 - app-editors/nano-4.5 should highlight BDEPEND
Summary: app-editors/nano-4.5 should highlight BDEPEND
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Lars Wendler (Polynomial-C) (RETIRED)
URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/nan...
Whiteboard: In upstream VCS
Keywords: PATCH
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2019-10-23 21:08 UTC by Alessandro Barbieri
Modified: 2019-11-03 15:08 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
nano-syntax-BDEPEND.patch (3A4M8EA.txt,891 bytes, patch)
2019-10-24 06:07 UTC, Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED)
Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Alessandro Barbieri 2019-10-23 21:08:14 UTC
While writing ebuilds I noticed that the BDEPEND variable isn't highlighted like DEPEND or RDEPEND
I'm requesting to also highlight BDEPEND
Comment 1 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2019-10-24 06:07:34 UTC
Created attachment 593744 [details, diff]
nano-syntax-BDEPEND.patch
Comment 2 Lars Wendler (Polynomial-C) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2019-10-26 13:05:07 UTC
Alright, upstream applied Jeroen's patch in their git repo. Do you guys desperately need this in a nano-4.5-r1 revbump or is it okay to wait for the next upstream nano release to have this incorporated?
Comment 3 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2019-10-26 13:26:25 UTC
(In reply to Lars Wendler (Polynomial-C) from comment #2)
> Alright, upstream applied Jeroen's patch in their git repo.

yay

> Do you guys
> desperately need this in a nano-4.5-r1 revbump or is it okay to wait for the
> next upstream nano release to have this incorporated?

Anyone who desperately needs it can surely edit the configuration locally.
Comment 4 Lars Wendler (Polynomial-C) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2019-11-03 15:08:00 UTC
(In reply to Jeroen Roovers from comment #3)
> (In reply to Lars Wendler (Polynomial-C) from comment #2)
> > Alright, upstream applied Jeroen's patch in their git repo.
> 
> yay
> 
> > Do you guys
> > desperately need this in a nano-4.5-r1 revbump or is it okay to wait for the
> > next upstream nano release to have this incorporated?
> 
> Anyone who desperately needs it can surely edit the configuration locally.

Thanks Jeroen. I consider this bug being fixed then.