FAILED: CMakeFiles/opencl-clang.dir/common_clang.cpp.o /usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-g++ -DCOMMON_CLANG_EXPORTS -DLIBCOMMON_CLANG_NAME=\"libopencl-clang.so.8\" -DUSE_PREBUILT_LLVM -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -I/usr/lib/llvm/8/include -I. -I. -DNDEBUG -O2 -pipe -march=native -fPIC -std=gnu++11 -MD -MT CMakeFiles/opencl-clang.dir/common_clang.cpp.o -MF CMakeFiles/opencl-clang.dir/common_clang.cpp.o.d -o CMakeFiles/opencl-clang.dir/common_clang.cpp.o -c /var/tmp/portage/dev-libs/opencl-clang-8.0.1/work/opencl-clang-8.0.1/common_clang.cpp /var/tmp/portage/dev-libs/opencl-clang-8.0.1/work/opencl-clang-8.0.1/common_clang.cpp:54:10: fatal error: LLVMSPIRVLib/LLVMSPIRVLib.h: No such file or directory 54 | #include "LLVMSPIRVLib/LLVMSPIRVLib.h" | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ compilation terminated. ------------------------------------------------------------------- This is an unstable amd64 chroot image at a tinderbox (==build bot) name: 17.1_no-multilib_hardened-20190920-071633 ------------------------------------------------------------------- gcc-config -l: [1] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-9.2.0 * Available Python interpreters, in order of preference: [1] python3.6 [2] python2.7 (fallback) Available Ruby profiles: [1] ruby24 (with Rubygems) [2] ruby25 (with Rubygems) * java-config: The following VMs are available for generation-2: *) IcedTea JDK 3.13.0 [icedtea-bin-8] Available Java Virtual Machines: [1] icedtea-bin-8 system-vm repository timestamp: ==> /var/db/repos/gentoo/metadata/timestamp.chk <== Sat, 21 Sep 2019 09:26:12 +0000 emerge -qpvO dev-libs/opencl-clang [ebuild N ] dev-libs/opencl-clang-8.0.1
Created attachment 590508 [details] emerge-info.txt
Created attachment 590510 [details] dev-libs:opencl-clang-8.0.1:20190921-121112.log
Created attachment 590512 [details] emerge-history.txt
Created attachment 590514 [details] environment
Created attachment 590516 [details] etc.portage.tbz2
Created attachment 590518 [details] logs.tbz2
Created attachment 590520 [details] temp.tbz2
MAy I asked what the fix is? B/c the issue does still occur.
(In reply to Toralf Förster from comment #8) > MAy I asked what the fix is? B/c the issue does still occur. Could you elaborate? The ebuild in question is absent from the tree (I removed it about 6 hours before you posted your comment) so I am somewhat confused regarding how it can still occur.
(In reply to Marek Szuba from comment #9) > (In reply to Toralf Förster from comment #8) > > MAy I asked what the fix is? B/c the issue does still occur. > > Could you elaborate? The ebuild in question is absent from the tree (I > removed it about 6 hours before you posted your comment) so I am somewhat > confused regarding how it can still occur. The log is from 20190921-121112.log - at that time the ebuild was still there. Few hours later I just "press" the button to report it - and within just a short time frame I do not check again whether an ebuild vanished or not.
Ah, okay. Guess we shall see if this shows up again for the current state of the tree, then.