Hi, first i'm really sorry if this is not a bug, I'm not at all a professional Python programmer (just a beginner :) ) and so I might have not seen a good or at least practical reason for this duplicate... So here it is : while browsing Portage code, I noticed that in function userquery(), file /bin/emerge (around line 85), the following for loop : for key in responses: if response.upper()==key[:len(response)].upper(): return key was duplicated; so it's not a major problem, I know, but is it necessary? Again, sorry if I made a mistake, I just wanted to share it and help Oh yes I checked in CVS too and the for loop is still there twice Thanks
*** Bug 69023 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
This bug has been fixed in CVS by jstubb :) Thanks