Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 673360 - sys-fs/udev-239 network interfaces renamed from enp0s3 to ens3 on virtual machines
Summary: sys-fs/udev-239 network interfaces renamed from enp0s3 to ens3 on virtual mac...
Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal
Assignee: udev maintainers
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2018-12-17 19:54 UTC by Johannes Hirte
Modified: 2019-02-22 10:16 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Johannes Hirte 2018-12-17 19:54:34 UTC
The update from sys-fs/udev-238 to sys-fs/udev-239 breaks network on my systems, because they're renamed from enp0s3 to ens3 on my virtual machines (libvirt/kvm). Downgrading to sys-fs/udev-238 fixed this reliable.
Comment 1 William Hubbs gentoo-dev 2018-12-25 21:50:28 UTC
Please test with udev-240. If this is still an issue, please report it
upstream [1] and link the issue here.

[1] https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/
Comment 2 Johannes Hirte 2018-12-26 21:26:04 UTC
With udev-240 it's renamed again, to eth0.

So now we have:

udev-238: enp0s3
udev-239: ens3
udev-240: eth0

This was all tested with linux-4.19.12. The only part that was changed was udev and meson for build-reasons.
Comment 3 Johannes Hirte 2018-12-26 21:38:11 UTC
bug reported upstream: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/11277
Comment 4 Johannes Hirte 2019-01-04 19:02:24 UTC
According to upstream, the network interface name from udev-238 was buggy. So changing this is right. But since udev-238 shows the wrong behaviour a big warning should be displayed during update. Especially for headless systems it's not acceptable, when the network interface becomes unreachable because of an update.
Comment 5 Mike Gilbert gentoo-dev 2019-01-24 14:58:33 UTC
The behavior in 239 is correct, and 240 has also been fixed via a backported patch.