Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 66648 - net-fs/samba arbitrary file access [DSA-600]
Summary: net-fs/samba arbitrary file access [DSA-600]
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Security
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Vulnerabilities (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Security
URL: http://www.debian.org/security/2004/d...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-10-07 07:06 UTC by Marc Vila
Modified: 2011-10-30 22:38 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Marc Vila 2004-10-07 07:06:39 UTC
A vulnerability has been discovered in samba, a commonly used LanManager-like file and printer server for Unix. A remote attacker may be able to gain access to files which exist outside of the share's defined path. Such files must still be readable by the account used for the connection, though.

CAN-2004-0815

http://www.debian.org/security/2004/dsa-600

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Comment 1 Marc Vila 2004-10-07 07:08:58 UTC
Security Notice -- CVE CAN-2004-0815

A security vulnerability has been located in Samba 2.2.x <= 2.2.11 and Samba 3.0.x <= 3.0.5. A remote attacker may be able to gain access to files which exist outside of the share's defined path. Such files must still be readable by the account used for the connection.

This may be a duplicate.
Comment 2 Marc Vila 2004-10-07 07:10:21 UTC
ERRATA : Security Notice -- CVE CAN-2004-0815

The original notice for CAN-2004-0815 indicated that Samba 3.0.x <= 3.0.5 was vulnerable to the security issue. After further research, Samba developers have confirmed that only Samba 3.0.2a and earlier releases contain the exploitable code. A new patch for Samba 3.0.2a and earlier (signature) has been posted.

http://us1.samba.org/samba/ftp/patches/security/samba-3.0.2a-reduce_name.patch
Comment 3 Luke Macken (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-10-07 07:18:47 UTC
Not sure if we issued a GLSA for this one.  Closing because none of the vulnerable versions are in portage.
Comment 4 Thierry Carrez (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-10-07 09:05:25 UTC
Yes, we already force >=3.0.5 and >=3.0.7 other GLSAs so everything is more than covered.