The VLC patch you need to apply: https://github.com/stefantalpalaru/gentoo-overlay/blob/8639952102cd4abf11d69eef819b30b2831aeb08/media-video/vlc/files/vlc-3.0.2-libaom.patch The build-time errors: codec/aom.c:92:23: error: ‘AOM_IMG_FMT_YUY2’ undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean ‘AOM_IMG_FMT_YV12’? { VLC_CODEC_YUYV, AOM_IMG_FMT_YUY2, 8, 0 }, ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ AOM_IMG_FMT_YV12 codec/aom.c:93:23: error: ‘AOM_IMG_FMT_UYVY’ undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean ‘AOM_IMG_FMT_YUY2’? { VLC_CODEC_UYVY, AOM_IMG_FMT_UYVY, 8, 0 }, ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ AOM_IMG_FMT_YUY2 codec/aom.c:94:23: error: ‘AOM_IMG_FMT_YVYU’ undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean ‘AOM_IMG_FMT_UYVY’? { VLC_CODEC_YVYU, AOM_IMG_FMT_YVYU, 8, 0 }, ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ AOM_IMG_FMT_UYVY codec/aom.c:96:24: error: ‘AOM_IMG_FMT_RGB555’ undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean ‘AOM_IMG_FMT_YVYU’? { VLC_CODEC_RGB15, AOM_IMG_FMT_RGB555, 8, 0 }, ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ AOM_IMG_FMT_YVYU codec/aom.c:97:24: error: ‘AOM_IMG_FMT_RGB565’ undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean ‘AOM_IMG_FMT_RGB555’? { VLC_CODEC_RGB16, AOM_IMG_FMT_RGB565, 8, 0 }, ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ AOM_IMG_FMT_RGB555 codec/aom.c:98:24: error: ‘AOM_IMG_FMT_RGB24’ undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean ‘AOM_IMG_FMT_RGB565’? { VLC_CODEC_RGB24, AOM_IMG_FMT_RGB24, 8, 0 }, ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ AOM_IMG_FMT_RGB565 codec/aom.c:99:24: error: ‘AOM_IMG_FMT_RGB32’ undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean ‘AOM_IMG_FMT_RGB24’? { VLC_CODEC_RGB32, AOM_IMG_FMT_RGB32, 8, 0 }, ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ AOM_IMG_FMT_RGB24 codec/aom.c:101:23: error: ‘AOM_IMG_FMT_ARGB’ undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean ‘AOM_IMG_FMT_RGB32’? { VLC_CODEC_ARGB, AOM_IMG_FMT_ARGB, 8, 0 }, ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ AOM_IMG_FMT_RGB32 codec/aom.c:102:23: error: ‘AOM_IMG_FMT_ARGB_LE’ undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean ‘AOM_IMG_FMT_ARGB’? { VLC_CODEC_BGRA, AOM_IMG_FMT_ARGB_LE, 8, 0 }, ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ AOM_IMG_FMT_ARGB
same error
What about 1.0.0?
@asturm 1.0.0 ebuild fails here -> #659538
(In reply to David Heidelberg (okias) from comment #3) > @asturm 1.0.0 ebuild fails here -> #659538 bug 659538 was fixed, what now?