Bug 6531 – java sdk html doc ebuilds

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Jacob Perkins 2002-08-15 11:22:21 UTC]

html javadoc for java sdk

[Comment 1 Jacob Perkins 2002-08-15 11:24:41 UTC]

Created attachment 3101 [details]
java-sdk-html-1.3.1.ebuild

javadoc for java sdk 1.3.1

[Comment 2 Jacob Perkins 2002-08-15 11:26:21 UTC]

Created attachment 3102 [details]
java-sdk-html-1.4.0.ebuild

javadoc for java sdk 1.4.0

[Comment 3 Jacob Perkins 2002-08-15 11:28:09 UTC]

When (if?) this gets added to portage, since there is a 'doc' use var, maybe add
a depend line (doc? app-doc/java-sdk-html) to at least sun's jdk to install this.

[Comment 4 Karl Trygve Kalleberg (RETIRED) 2002-08-16 09:43:18 UTC]

Good idea. Only problem I can see is that it relies on the "sun" license, which
does not exist in /usr/portage/licenses. 

Please either attach the full license text to this bug, and name it
appropriately (usually sun-<acronym from the top of the license file>), or see
if it is actually any of the other licenses we have in /usr/portage/licenses (I
sincerely doubt this to be the case).

Apart from that, it looks okay (not sure if there's a point in rewriting the cp
stuff in src_install to dohtml).

[Comment 5 Jacob Perkins 2002-08-16 10:30:08 UTC]

Created attachment 3135 [details]
sun-j2sl

The license doesn't seem to have an actual name, which is why I just said "sun"
in the ebuilds. So, I'm naming it sun - Java 2 Specification License
(sun-j2sl). Feel free to change it so something more appropriate if necessary.

[Comment 6 Jacob Perkins 2002-08-16 10:31:37 UTC]

The reason I did a cp loop instead of dohtml is that dohtml (and all the other
'do' commands) is recursive and there are quite a few subdirs. If there is a
relatively easy way to change it dohtml, I don't mind doing it.

[Comment 7 Jacob Perkins 2002-08-16 10:32:44 UTC]

I meant above that the do commands are NOT recursive

[Comment 8 Karl Trygve Kalleberg (RETIRED) 2002-08-16 12:35:10 UTC]

dohtml -r turns on recursion, but it filters out all the .java files, so it's
not really more practical to use in this case. 

Anyway, your packages have been committed, they are available as
dev-java/java-sdk-docs-1.3.1 and 
dev-java/java-sdk-docs-1.4.0

I renamed them to be somewhat consistent with dev-python/python-docs :)

[Comment 9 Jacob Perkins 2002-08-16 12:44:10 UTC]

what about the doc? is sun-jdk? Should I submit an updated ebuild as a new bug?

[Comment 10 Jacob Perkins 2002-08-16 14:54:38 UTC]

You didn't change the license name in the ebuilds to sun-j2sl