* Detected file collision(s): * * /usr/include/list.h * * Searching all installed packages for file collisions... * * Press Ctrl-C to Stop * * dev-libs/liblist-2.4:0::gentoo * /usr/include/list.h * * Package 'sys-fs/f2fs-tools-1.9.0' NOT merged due to file collisions. ------------------------------------------------------------------- This is an unstable amd64 chroot image at a tinderbox (==build bot) name: 17.0_libressl-test_20180106-200451 ------------------------------------------------------------------- gcc-config -l: [1] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-7.2.0 * Available Python interpreters, in order of preference: [1] python3.5 [2] python3.6 (fallback) [3] python2.7 (fallback) java-config: The following VMs are available for generation-2: *) IcedTea JDK 3.6.0 [icedtea-bin-8] Available Java Virtual Machines: [1] icedtea-bin-8 system-vm emerge -qpv sys-fs/f2fs-tools [ebuild N ] sys-fs/f2fs-tools-1.8.0 USE="(-selinux)"
Created attachment 513904 [details] emerge-info.txt
Created attachment 513906 [details] emerge-history.txt
Created attachment 513908 [details] etc.portage.tbz2
Created attachment 513910 [details] logs.tbz2
Created attachment 513912 [details] sys-fs:f2fs-tools-1.9.0:20180109-165826.log
I just fell into this.
(In reply to Sławomir Nizio from comment #6) > I just fell into this. thanks for confirming, i may have to block against dev-libs/liblist. let me check that this won't cause any problems before i commit
If possible, it would be great to avoid installing this file altogether, so that both packages could be installed. Maybe this header is being installed by mistake?
(In reply to Sławomir Nizio from comment #8) > If possible, it would be great to avoid installing this file altogether, so > that both packages could be installed. Maybe this header is being installed > by mistake? there is a new version out which has fixed a build issue wrt `make dist`. let me see if that avoids installing list.h.
(In reply to Anthony Basile from comment #9) > (In reply to Sławomir Nizio from comment #8) > > If possible, it would be great to avoid installing this file altogether, so > > that both packages could be installed. Maybe this header is being installed > > by mistake? > > there is a new version out which has fixed a build issue wrt `make dist`. > let me see if that avoids installing list.h. okay 1.10.0 resolves this issue. i've removed 1.8.0 and 1.9.0 from the tree. we should be good.
And it was even your fix that went upstream :) thanks!
(In reply to Sławomir Nizio from comment #11) > And it was even your fix that went upstream :) thanks! it was?! wow, i forgot even sending it. i wonder if that's a good or bad sign.