The following profiles are currently marked dev: amd64 default/linux/amd64/13.0/selinux amd64 default/linux/amd64/17.0/selinux amd64 default/linux/amd64/17.0/hardened/selinux amd64 default/linux/amd64/17.0/no-multilib/hardened/selinux x86 default/linux/x86/13.0/selinux x86 default/linux/x86/17.0/selinux Could we mark them all stable appropriately? I've tested that the first three pass CI, and I will test the rest before committing. Also, could you pinpoint an 'effective' maintainer for each of those profiles? Should them all be maintained by selinux@? Or maybe those 'combined' should be selinux+hardened@? And possibly the arch team?
I don't know how x86 can help here. I have no objections but I don't use selinux so I don't really know...
Yeah, they can all be stabilized if CI passes :). The 13.0 ones are not required, they werent used much, but can be stabled no problem. As for maintainer, selinux@gentoo is good. I'm not sure how to mark the maintainer properly tho since they are combined in with the others maintained by amd64@ and stuff.
seems this already has been done for 17.0 profiles.
