Bug 642376 – sys-devel/gcc-6.4.0 doesn't compile under profile 17.1 on amd64

• Status: RESOLVED NEEDINFO
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Maurice Volaski 2017-12-27 07:11:32 UTC]

Created attachment 511712 [details]
emerge info

The error is 
/usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/../lib/libc.so when searching for -lc 
/usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/../lib/libc.a when searching for -lc 
/usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: i386:x86-64 architecture of input file `/usr/lib/../lib/crti.o' is incompatible with i386 output 
/usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: i386:x86-64 architecture of input file `/usr/lib/../lib/crtn.o' is incompatible with i386 output 
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status 
make[5]: *** [Makefile:950: libgcc_s.so] Error 1 
make[5]: Leaving directory '/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-6.4.0/work/build/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/32/libgcc' 
make[4]: *** [Makefile:1161: multi-do] Error 1 
make[4]: Leaving directory '/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-6.4.0/work/build/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libgcc' 
make[3]: *** [Makefile:120: all-multi] Error 2 
make[3]: Leaving directory '/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-6.4.0/work/build/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libgcc' 
make[2]: *** [Makefile:15659: all-stage1-target-libgcc] Error 2 
make[2]: Leaving directory '/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-6.4.0/work/build' 
make[1]: *** [Makefile:20222: stage1-bubble] Error 2 
make[1]: Leaving directory '/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-6.4.0/work/build' 
make: *** [Makefile:20554: bootstrap-lean] Error 2

[Comment 1 Tomáš Mózes 2017-12-27 07:40:34 UTC]

Please always attach the full build log.

[Comment 2 Jonas Stein 2017-12-27 11:27:12 UTC]

Please *attach* the logfiles,
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Attach_the_logs_to_the_bug_ticket
and reopen this ticket (Status:unconfirmed).

[Comment 3 Maurice Volaski 2017-12-27 15:50:51 UTC]

Created attachment 511760 [details]
build log

[Comment 4 Maurice Volaski 2017-12-27 15:51:27 UTC]

By the way, it compiles under profile 17.0.

[Comment 5 Alexander Tsoy 2017-12-27 21:51:58 UTC]

Have you performed the migration as explained in the news item?

[Comment 6 Maurice Volaski 2018-01-08 19:51:27 UTC]

I didn't perform the migration as described. That's because I wasn't even aware the 17.1 profile was experimental. I do believe there is a bug that can be addressed here. Experimental profiles showing up in eselect profile list should be marked this way. And then when selecting them, there should be output to point out that there are prerequisites to selecting such a profile. In other words, it's not simply enough to warn users in Gentoo News.

It appears that the 17.1 profile was removed, at least on a new install I am not seeing it any longer in the profile list.

[Comment 7 Alexander Tsoy 2018-01-09 05:37:53 UTC]

(In reply to Maurice Volaski from comment #6)
> I didn't perform the migration as described. That's because I wasn't even
> aware the 17.1 profile was experimental. I do believe there is a bug that
> can be addressed here. Experimental profiles showing up in eselect profile
> list should be marked this way. And then when selecting them, there should
> be output to point out that there are prerequisites to selecting such a
> profile. In other words, it's not simply enough to warn users in Gentoo News.

See bug 643864