64138 – app-cdr/cdrw-base-0.2 has a dependency on devfsd

Bug 64138 - app-cdr/cdrw-base-0.2 has a dependency on devfsd

Summary: app-cdr/cdrw-base-0.2 has a dependency on devfsd

Status:	RESOLVED FIXED

Alias:	None

Product:	Gentoo Linux
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware:	All Linux

Importance:	High normal (vote)
Assignee:	Gentoo TreeCleaner Project

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Duplicates (1):	178002 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2004-09-15 07:39 UTC by Diederik van der Boor
Modified:	2007-09-15 12:38 UTC (History)
CC List:	3 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required:	---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Diederik van der Boor 2004-09-15 07:39:49 UTC

The ebuild app-cdr/cdrw-base-0.2 has a dependency on devfsd, giving problems on udev systems. This problem only occured with emerge -D

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:

Comment 1 Lars Weiler (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2004-10-30 22:11:23 UTC

Yes, as it is for devfsd only.  udev uses another scheme for device-configuration.  Probably the correct files could be added later.

Comment 2 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2007-05-11 07:48:18 UTC

*** Bug 178002 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 3 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2007-05-11 07:49:16 UTC

I honestly fail to see what's this package good for. This should be package.masked on all but 2.4 profiles.

Comment 4 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2007-06-30 22:01:38 UTC

Nothing depends on this; lets wipe the junk.

Comment 5 Raúl Porcel (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2007-07-01 16:59:47 UTC

++

Comment 6 Doug Goldstein (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2007-07-02 15:57:50 UTC

+++ <- better then armin!

Comment 7 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2007-07-09 16:09:42 UTC

+1 for punting it.

Comment 8 Raúl Porcel (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2007-07-09 16:22:53 UTC

Masking it on profiles/p.mask and unmask it in 2.4 profiles could fix this?

Comment 9 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2007-07-09 18:18:22 UTC

(In reply to comment #8)
> Masking it on profiles/p.mask and unmask it in 2.4 profiles could fix this?

Well, fix what exactly? The package is completely nonsensical.

Comment 10 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2007-07-20 08:43:58 UTC

# Samuli Suominen <drac@gentoo.org> (20 Jul 2007)
# Orphaned configuration files using devfsd.
# Masked for treecleaners. Removed in 60 days.
# Bug 64138.
app-cdr/cdrw-base

Comment 11 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2007-09-15 12:38:19 UTC

Gone.