Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 62757 - .51_pre20 - nonexisting /tmp/sandboxpids.tmp + userpriv == fun
Summary: .51_pre20 - nonexisting /tmp/sandboxpids.tmp + userpriv == fun
Status: RESOLVED CANTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Portage Development
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Core (show other bugs)
Hardware: All All
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Portage team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-09-03 14:45 UTC by Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED)
Modified: 2004-09-08 23:35 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-09-03 14:45:16 UTC
make[2]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/qhacc-3.2.1/work/qhacc-3.2.1'
make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/qhacc-3.2.1/work/qhacc-3.2.1'
Unable to delete file in security violation (bad owner/group): /tmp/sandboxpids.tmp

/tmp _is_ world writable
Comment 1 Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-09-03 15:24:23 UTC
Are you also using usersandbox?
Comment 2 Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-09-03 15:30:23 UTC
good question, Chris - yes
Comment 3 Nicholas Jones (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-09-04 09:52:06 UTC
You're going to have to merge the summary and the text to actually
say what is going on.

Here's my guess explaination/info-request:

If you don't have that file and it's reporting the inability to
unlink, what were you doing relating to /tmp and sandbox? Did you
have a concurrent execution of portage or repoman? Anything modifying
files?

Comment 4 Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-09-05 10:57:55 UTC
>what were you doing relating to /tmp and sandbox?
Beside having "userpriv usersandbox" in features - nothing.

>have a concurrent execution of portage or repoman?
no

>Anything modifying files?
no

The not so funny thing: Even though I asked in #gentoo-dev and ferringb said he could reproduce it - I can't anymore. It was the first emerge <foo> after switching from .50 to .51 and I'm  pretty sure, that I did not execute portage stuff concurrently.
Comment 5 Paul de Vrieze (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-09-06 02:30:48 UTC
I have used userpriv/usersandbox exclusively and never have seen this problem either. I'm running _pre20 too.
Comment 6 Nicholas Jones (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-09-08 23:35:01 UTC
can't be duplicated