New test version. Ebuild is the same with 2.50. DIST OOoFBTools-2.51.zip 5632570 SHA256 78d7d9e0f0176de322d20143165a9ece65d776308cc8d376e89dadac01057943 SHA512 c89044c9e6b82a51fcfb370a31cc2ef6ab16cc2895667519324c42c450164ed933e3b492b3ed21a50dd5e563bf796f71bb7333132410fba512eb59e1d5b7255d WHIRLPOOL 748f17c23538c4424e63b4070ca6317a6b813dd240787e98b10b62456d024414b3d6960a2fd6b3c1551225ea8009f87f62faab5f62b5205ddbe3ae717ecdd139 This version should replace previous test version 2.50.
I suggest to bump to EAPI=6 while bumping.
(In reply to Jonas Stein from comment #1) > I suggest to bump to EAPI=6 while bumping. EAPI=6 is not supported by office-ext-r1 yet: * ERROR: app-officeext/ooofbtools-2.51::local_hdd failed (depend phase): * EAPI=6 is not supported * * Call stack: * ebuild.sh, line 611: Called source '/usr/portage/local/app-officeext/ooofbtools/ooofbtools-2.51.ebuild' * ooofbtools-2.51.ebuild, line 13: Called inherit 'office-ext-r1' * ebuild.sh, line 307: Called __qa_source '/usr/portage/gentoo/eclass/office-ext-r1.eclass' * ebuild.sh, line 102: Called source '/usr/portage/gentoo/eclass/office-ext-r1.eclass' * office-ext-r1.eclass, line 15: Called die And, as I see in portage's eclasses directory, it is the only eclass for LO extensions packaging. Is it a time to ask portage developers about review/update of eclass?
commit 6ffe9a1b6086582bbe91d35d21b4fad0748fa9c0 Author: Sergey Popov <pinkbyte@gentoo.org> Date: Wed Jul 26 15:23:42 2017 +0300 office-ext-r1.eclass: add support for EAPI 6 commit 0de9029e16f64c8aac31f6104fa2f375d41bc0b4 Author: Sergey Popov <pinkbyte@gentoo.org> Date: Wed Jul 26 15:44:34 2017 +0300 app-officeext/ooofbtools: version bump Reported-by: Sergey S. Starikoff <Ikonta@yandex.ru> Gentoo-Bug: 624530 Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.6, Repoman-2.3.1 Eclass change is trivial one-liner, so i pluck up courage and commit it