Bug 620376 – media-gfx/cura-2.3.1-r2 and co. stabilization request

• Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Michael 'veremitz' Everitt 2017-06-02 01:05:40 UTC]

Please stabilise media-gfx/cura-2.3.1. Thanks.

[Comment 1 Stabilization helper bot 2017-06-21 01:00:40 UTC]

An automated check of this bug failed - repoman reported dependency errors (41 lines truncated): 

> dependency.bad media-gfx/cura/cura-2.3.1.ebuild: DEPEND: amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0) ['dev-libs/libarcus:=[python,python_targets_python3_4(-)?,python_targets_python3_5(-)?,-python_single_target_jython2_7(-),-python_single_target_pypy(-),-python_single_target_pypy3(-),-python_single_target_python2_7(-),-python_single_target_python3_6(-),python_single_target_python3_4(+)?,python_single_target_python3_5(+)?]', 'dev-python/uranium[python_targets_python3_4(-)?,python_targets_python3_5(-)?,-python_single_target_jython2_7(-),-python_single_target_pypy(-),-python_single_target_pypy3(-),-python_single_target_python2_7(-),-python_single_target_python3_6(-),python_single_target_python3_4(+)?,python_single_target_python3_5(+)?]', '~media-gfx/curaengine-2.3.1']
> dependency.bad media-gfx/cura/cura-2.3.1.ebuild: RDEPEND: amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0) ['dev-libs/libarcus:=[python,python_targets_python3_4(-)?,python_targets_python3_5(-)?,-python_single_target_jython2_7(-),-python_single_target_pypy(-),-python_single_target_pypy3(-),-python_single_target_python2_7(-),-python_single_target_python3_6(-),python_single_target_python3_4(+)?,python_single_target_python3_5(+)?]', 'dev-python/uranium[python_targets_python3_4(-)?,python_targets_python3_5(-)?,-python_single_target_jython2_7(-),-python_single_target_pypy(-),-python_single_target_pypy3(-),-python_single_target_python2_7(-),-python_single_target_python3_6(-),python_single_target_python3_4(+)?,python_single_target_python3_5(+)?]', '~media-gfx/curaengine-2.3.1']
> dependency.bad media-gfx/cura/cura-2.3.1.ebuild: DEPEND: amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop) ['dev-libs/libarcus:=[python,python_targets_python3_4(-)?,python_targets_python3_5(-)?,-python_single_target_jython2_7(-),-python_single_target_pypy(-),-python_single_target_pypy3(-),-python_single_target_python2_7(-),-python_single_target_python3_6(-),python_single_target_python3_4(+)?,python_single_target_python3_5(+)?]', 'dev-python/uranium[python_targets_python3_4(-)?,python_targets_python3_5(-)?,-python_single_target_jython2_7(-),-python_single_target_pypy(-),-python_single_target_pypy3(-),-python_single_target_python2_7(-),-python_single_target_python3_6(-),python_single_target_python3_4(+)?,python_single_target_python3_5(+)?]', '~media-gfx/curaengine-2.3.1']

[Comment 2 Stabilization helper bot 2017-06-21 02:00:40 UTC]

An automated check of this bug failed - repoman reported dependency errors (41 lines truncated): 

> dependency.bad media-gfx/cura/cura-2.3.1.ebuild: DEPEND: amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0) ['dev-libs/libarcus:=[python,python_targets_python3_4(-)?,python_targets_python3_5(-)?,-python_single_target_jython2_7(-),-python_single_target_pypy(-),-python_single_target_pypy3(-),-python_single_target_python2_7(-),-python_single_target_python3_6(-),python_single_target_python3_4(+)?,python_single_target_python3_5(+)?]', '~media-gfx/curaengine-2.3.1']
> dependency.bad media-gfx/cura/cura-2.3.1.ebuild: RDEPEND: amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0) ['dev-libs/libarcus:=[python,python_targets_python3_4(-)?,python_targets_python3_5(-)?,-python_single_target_jython2_7(-),-python_single_target_pypy(-),-python_single_target_pypy3(-),-python_single_target_python2_7(-),-python_single_target_python3_6(-),python_single_target_python3_4(+)?,python_single_target_python3_5(+)?]', '~media-gfx/curaengine-2.3.1']
> dependency.bad media-gfx/cura/cura-2.3.1.ebuild: DEPEND: amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop) ['dev-libs/libarcus:=[python,python_targets_python3_4(-)?,python_targets_python3_5(-)?,-python_single_target_jython2_7(-),-python_single_target_pypy(-),-python_single_target_pypy3(-),-python_single_target_python2_7(-),-python_single_target_python3_6(-),python_single_target_python3_4(+)?,python_single_target_python3_5(+)?]', '~media-gfx/curaengine-2.3.1']

[Comment 3 Pacho Ramos 2017-12-04 13:40:55 UTC]

maybe newer version can be tried at present time

[Comment 4 Michael 'veremitz' Everitt 2017-12-04 13:46:12 UTC]

(In reply to Pacho Ramos from comment #3)
> maybe newer version can be tried at present time

If you would kindly leave this set of bugs alone, as the dependency tree is quite long. We had just finally got the bottom 'branch' stabilised, but were waiting for the arch teams to get back through the higher-up branches.

Of course, if you're able to perform the stabilisations yourself, please do carry on ...

Otherwise, kindly save the stablebot CPU cycles, and avoid breaking the dependency tree of this set of bugs, thank you.

[Comment 5 Pacho Ramos 2017-12-04 18:21:56 UTC]

What button branch was stabilized? I see all cura versions still in testing. Also, if nobody is going to prepare a list, even suggest others to not even try to rely on stable bot to complete one... I don't see the reason to keep this bug opened here getting obsolete along the time and targetting versions that will likely even be removed in the future

Also, maybe merging bug 622364 , 620376 and 622362 in one single bug with a list could simply stabilizations

[Comment 6 Pacho Ramos 2017-12-04 18:26:48 UTC]

*** Bug 622362 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Comment 7 Pacho Ramos 2017-12-04 18:27:05 UTC]

*** Bug 622364 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Comment 8 Pacho Ramos 2017-12-04 18:32:46 UTC]

We will need to keep 2.3.1 as 2.6.0 needs an even newer protobuf* due to python3.6 support

[Comment 9 Pacho Ramos 2017-12-04 18:35:33 UTC]

This list is working.... even doesn't depend on protobuf bug as needed versions are already stabilized in relevant arches for a long time

[Comment 10 Stabilization helper bot 2017-12-04 19:04:15 UTC]

An automated check of this bug succeeded - the previous repoman errors are now resolved.

[Comment 11 Michael 'veremitz' Everitt 2017-12-04 20:49:50 UTC]

So, 20 emails, 5 bugs later, and we're back to where we started .. and only two people's time wasted....

And yet I still don't see any changes in KEYWORDS ..

[Comment 12 Pacho Ramos 2017-12-04 22:17:48 UTC]

Well... I have seen your education level at least

[Comment 13 Michael 'veremitz' Everitt 2017-12-04 22:54:19 UTC]

(In reply to Pacho Ramos from comment #12)
> Well... I have seen your education level at least
And presumably how long ago that was now ... !! :]

[Comment 14 Thomas Deutschmann (RETIRED) 2017-12-12 17:37:39 UTC]

x86 stopped stabilization due to bug 640838.

[Comment 15 Mikle Kolyada (RETIRED) 2018-01-04 20:48:57 UTC]

CC arches back when  bug 640838 will be solved.

[Comment 16 Michael 'veremitz' Everitt 2018-04-03 00:20:41 UTC]

Fixed broken test in CuraEngine - bug 640838

[Comment 17 Stabilization helper bot 2018-04-03 01:00:16 UTC]

An automated check of this bug failed - the following atom is unknown:

dev-python/uranium-2.3.1

Please verify the atom list.

[Comment 18 Michael 'veremitz' Everitt 2018-04-03 01:09:15 UTC]

@Python team - any chance we can revert https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=380abbf4fac7c5ffdf4ca27951b7ac699e613f3b please, as the dependency-versions are quite tightly coupled for this package. I'm surprised the CI bot didn't trip up on this one actually .. perhaps it doesn't check versions that closely ..

Cheers!

[Comment 19 Stabilization helper bot 2018-05-05 12:00:28 UTC]

An automated check of this bug failed - the following atom is unknown:

media-gfx/cura-2.3.1-r1

Please verify the atom list.

[Comment 20 Stabilization helper bot 2018-05-05 13:01:21 UTC]

An automated check of this bug failed - repoman reported dependency errors (63 lines truncated): 

> dependency.bad dev-python/uranium/uranium-2.6.0.ebuild: DEPEND: amd64(default/linux/amd64/17.0) ['~dev-libs/libarcus-2.6.0:*[python_targets_python3_4(-)?,python_targets_python3_5(-)?,python_targets_python3_6(-)?,-python_single_target_jython2_7(-),-python_single_target_pypy(-),-python_single_target_pypy3(-),-python_single_target_python2_7(-),python_single_target_python3_4(+)?,python_single_target_python3_5(+)?,python_single_target_python3_6(+)?]']
> dependency.bad dev-python/uranium/uranium-2.6.0.ebuild: RDEPEND: amd64(default/linux/amd64/17.0) ['~dev-libs/libarcus-2.6.0:*[python_targets_python3_4(-)?,python_targets_python3_5(-)?,python_targets_python3_6(-)?,-python_single_target_jython2_7(-),-python_single_target_pypy(-),-python_single_target_pypy3(-),-python_single_target_python2_7(-),python_single_target_python3_4(+)?,python_single_target_python3_5(+)?,python_single_target_python3_6(+)?]']
> dependency.bad dev-python/uranium/uranium-2.6.0.ebuild: DEPEND: amd64(default/linux/amd64/17.0/desktop) ['~dev-libs/libarcus-2.6.0:*[python_targets_python3_4(-)?,python_targets_python3_5(-)?,python_targets_python3_6(-)?,-python_single_target_jython2_7(-),-python_single_target_pypy(-),-python_single_target_pypy3(-),-python_single_target_python2_7(-),python_single_target_python3_4(+)?,python_single_target_python3_5(+)?,python_single_target_python3_6(+)?]']

[Comment 21 Thomas Deutschmann (RETIRED) 2018-05-06 22:17:37 UTC]

x86 stopped stabilization due to bug 655116.

[Comment 22 Michael 'veremitz' Everitt 2018-05-07 00:58:19 UTC]

(In reply to Thomas Deutschmann from comment #21)
> x86 stopped stabilization due to bug 655116.

Thanks Thomas.

Will investigate again, and then Rinse and repeat.. :D

[Comment 23 Michael 'veremitz' Everitt 2018-05-13 22:52:20 UTC]

Hoping to reinstate dev-python/uranium-2.3.1 for purposes of stabilising, as part of PR #8258 - which will also squash bugs 626002, 630620.

[Comment 24 Mikle Kolyada (RETIRED) 2018-06-14 14:17:44 UTC]

Closed as per alexxy's request