=app-text/hunspell-1.6.1-r1 stabilization: please do
Stable for HPPA.
An automated check of this bug failed - repoman reported dependency errors (2 lines truncated): > dependency.bad app-text/hunspell/hunspell-1.6.1-r1.ebuild: PDEPEND: ppc64(default/linux/powerpc/ppc64/13.0/64bit-userland) ['app-dicts/myspell-mi'] > dependency.bad app-text/hunspell/hunspell-1.6.1-r1.ebuild: PDEPEND: ppc64(default/linux/powerpc/ppc64/13.0/64bit-userland/desktop) ['app-dicts/myspell-mi'] > dependency.bad app-text/hunspell/hunspell-1.6.1-r1.ebuild: PDEPEND: ppc64(default/linux/powerpc/ppc64/13.0/64bit-userland/desktop/gnome) ['app-dicts/myspell-mi']
I support this petition, however, there's some work to do with app-office/libreoffice-bin because it needs strictly the :0= version of hunspell. So as a suggestion, rework that package before stabilize hunspell.
(In reply to jorgicio from comment #3) > I support this petition, however, there's some work to do with > app-office/libreoffice-bin because it needs strictly the :0= version of > hunspell. So as a suggestion, rework that package before stabilize hunspell. arches, ignore ^ this. jorgicio: this bug is only for arches that do not support libreoffice-bin.
(In reply to Andreas K. Hüttel from comment #0) > =app-text/hunspell-1.6.1-r1 stabilization: please do ppc64 neds in addition =app-dicts/myspell-mi-20060316
(In reply to Andreas K. Hüttel from comment #4) > (In reply to jorgicio from comment #3) > > I support this petition, however, there's some work to do with > > app-office/libreoffice-bin because it needs strictly the :0= version of > > hunspell. So as a suggestion, rework that package before stabilize hunspell. > > arches, ignore ^ this. > > jorgicio: this bug is only for arches that do not support libreoffice-bin. Sorry, but: is this a form to correct a person? What kind of bad manners are that? Seriously, dude?
Stable on alpha.
sparc stable
ppc stable
ppc64 stable
arm stable
ia64 stable. Closing.