Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 611760 - Feature Request: Include cpuid2cpuflag in Install CD and install docs
Summary: Feature Request: Include cpuid2cpuflag in Install CD and install docs
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Documentation
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Other (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Docs Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2017-03-05 03:11 UTC by Walter Dnes
Modified: 2017-03-08 04:40 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Walter Dnes 2017-03-05 03:11:06 UTC
Rationale: Except for cross-compilation, cpuid2cpuflags output for use in make.conf is "set-it-and-forget-it" at the install stage. It should be in place from the beginning so that newly installed programs get full benefit, starting from the first "emerge". I suggest including instructions in the install docs at the same point as setting USE flags in make.conf. It fits in at that point, because this is one more variable that has to be set up in make.conf.

Currently cpuid2cpuflag is only used on x86/x86_64, but I notice a thread on gentoo-dev about an arm/arm64 port. So I'm leaving the "Hardware" selection as "All", meaning "all architectures where cpuid2cpuflag is implemented".

Reproducible: Always
Comment 1 Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2017-03-05 16:02:23 UTC
I don't see a need to have this in the install-cd. This is a very small package that one can install after unpacking stage3, configure and then drop it again.

@docs:
What do you say?
Comment 2 nm (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2017-03-08 04:40:18 UTC
(In reply to Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto from comment #1)
> I don't see a need to have this in the install-cd. This is a very small
> package that one can install after unpacking stage3, configure and then drop
> it again.
> 
> @docs:
> What do you say?

Agreed. This is definitely not something we should include in our installation handbook or the installation CD. Too limited.