Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 61142 - "emerge search 77" should tell user that f77/g77 is a feature, not a package
Summary: "emerge search 77" should tell user that f77/g77 is a feature, not a package
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Portage Development
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Enhancement/Feature Requests (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Portage team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-08-21 06:06 UTC by ivo welch
Modified: 2004-08-25 21:06 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description ivo welch 2004-08-21 06:06:37 UTC
"emerge search 77"  should tell user that f77/g77 is a feature, not a package.  I was stymied for a long time why there was no fortran compiler.  more generically, available USE flags could be searched, too, not just the available packages; perhaps at the end, emerge could write---
   also available as USE flag: f77


Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Comment 1 Brian Harring (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-08-22 19:31:05 UTC
Err... not much for this one personally.  Searching use flag's via emerge -s seems wrong; viewing use flags is the domain of a tool such as ufed...
Comment 2 ivo welch 2004-08-22 20:04:21 UTC
well, if I had remember that the fortran compiler g77 was a use flag, I would not have needed a reminder.  the problem is I did not remember all the use flags.  who would remember that g77 is a use flag, not an application?

it's just a friendly short reminder at the end...and it was just a suggestion to reduce dumb user questions like ming from clogging bugzilla.

the cost of adding this little note at the end must be trivial.

regards,

/iaw
Comment 3 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2004-08-25 21:06:55 UTC
the fortran compiler is part of gcc and since we dont usually split packages around here, you should have looked into gcc

adding a special case for this to emerge just doesnt sit right