This prevents my system from rebuilding. [ebuild R ] net-im/climm-0.7.1 USE="gnutls ssl tcl xmpp (-otr)" util_tcl.c: In function 'TCL_command_climm': util_tcl.c:128:25: error: 'Tcl_Interp' has no member named 'result' snprintf (interp->result, TCL_RESULT_SIZE, \ ^ util_tcl.c:149:9: note: in expansion of macro 'TCL_CHECK_PARMS' TCL_CHECK_PARMS (1); ^ util_tcl.c:128:25: error: 'Tcl_Interp' has no member named 'result' snprintf (interp->result, TCL_RESULT_SIZE, \ ^ util_tcl.c:195:9: note: in expansion of macro 'TCL_CHECK_PARMS' TCL_CHECK_PARMS (1); ^ util_tcl.c:128:25: error: 'Tcl_Interp' has no member named 'result' snprintf (interp->result, TCL_RESULT_SIZE, \ ^ util_tcl.c:234:9: note: in expansion of macro 'TCL_CHECK_PARMS' TCL_CHECK_PARMS (1); ^ util_tcl.c:128:25: error: 'Tcl_Interp' has no member named 'result' snprintf (interp->result, TCL_RESULT_SIZE, \ ^ util_tcl.c:254:9: note: in expansion of macro 'TCL_CHECK_PARMS' TCL_CHECK_PARMS (1); ^ util_tcl.c:271:25: error: 'Tcl_Interp' has no member named 'result' snprintf (interp->result, TCL_RESULT_SIZE, ^
Created attachment 461124 [details] emerge --info
Created attachment 461126 [details] build.log
@deference, do you actually use this package? Upstream seems to be dead and this is not widely packaged elsewhere so I would be inclined to remove it.
I had installed it because I was looking for non-gui ICQ/IRC client. I was going to see how climm worked. I'll hang onto the climm package and the tcl & tk packages so that I can build it and test how well it works. If I like it I might take up maintainer-ship. But for now you may hard mask it or remove it as you see fit.
Hmm. I just was rebuilding my system and climm and plplot (both of which fialed to build agianst the newer tcl), installed fine. I rechecked that I really do have the correct version of tcl installed and I have 8.6.6. I don't know what to say except that you need not tree clean climm.
Builds for me fine too. Should we keep it or remove it anyway?
I confirm this builds and runs properly... we can keep it for now then :)
I agree. I tried to find out what changed that enabled it to build, but not mercury-extras (which has the same problem), but I have no ideas.