Bug 60274 – [update] nbsmtp-0.96.ebuild

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Fernando J. Pereda (RETIRED) 2004-08-13 14:32:56 UTC]

Version bump. Renaming old ebuilds won't work.

I attach a right ebuild.

Regards,
Ferdy

[Comment 1 Fernando J. Pereda (RETIRED) 2004-08-13 14:34:03 UTC]

Created attachment 37383 [details]
nbsmtp-0.96.ebuild

Working ebuild for nbsmtp-0.96

[Comment 2 Fernando J. Pereda (RETIRED) 2004-08-13 14:41:58 UTC]

*** Bug 54361 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Comment 3 Andrej Kacian (RETIRED) 2004-09-01 08:28:58 UTC]

Did you test for ppc as well, since you included it in KEYWORDS?

[Comment 4 Andrej Kacian (RETIRED) 2004-09-01 08:55:40 UTC]

Few insights on the ebuild:
1. nbsmtp-${PV} (in SRC_URI) is the same as ${P} here
2. The line S=${WORKDIR}/nbsmtp-${PV} is unnecessary, as it is the default setting for ${S}
3. Is the !virtual/mta depend really necessary? It can co-exist happily with my postfix, for example, and it doesn't overwrite any file belonging to other MTA package. Look at for example mail-mta/msmtp, it's a similar package.

Once you get this fixed, I will add 0.96 ebuild to portage.

[Comment 5 Fernando J. Pereda (RETIRED) 2004-09-01 11:27:19 UTC]

Created attachment 38697 [details]
nbsmtp-0.96.ebuild (with fixes)

Cleaned

[Comment 6 Fernando J. Pereda (RETIRED) 2004-09-01 11:33:00 UTC]

I'm currently developing it on a ppc machine and testing it also on a hppa server.

About the !virtual-mta i was wrong...

Cheers,
Ferdy

[Comment 7 Andrej Kacian (RETIRED) 2004-09-02 11:12:22 UTC]

There was an invalid header (see http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/handbook/handbook.xml?part=2&chap=3 for detals, missing '$' in SRC_URI's ${P} variable and I have also changed the ebuild to use use_enable for ssl and debug USE flags. It was impossible to use it for ipv6, since configure flag is "--enable-inet6", not "--enable-ipv6".

Committed to CVS after I fixed all this and checked basic functionality. Thanks for submitting, hopefully with less mistakes next time. :)

[Comment 8 Fernando J. Pereda (RETIRED) 2004-09-02 11:55:58 UTC]

Thanks a million so. I hope next time you wont have to bother with my errors :D

Thanks again.

Ferdy