Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 59974 - libgtkhtml-3.0.10-r1 depends on gal-2.0
Summary: libgtkhtml-3.0.10-r1 depends on gal-2.0
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Low normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Linux Gnome Desktop Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-08-10 11:56 UTC by Chris Irwin
Modified: 2004-08-10 21:43 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Chris Irwin 2004-08-10 11:56:06 UTC
libgtkhtml depends on gal-2.0 (specifically, the latest version of 1.99.11), it does not look for gal-2.2 (latest in portage is 2.1.13). These libraries are slotted.

There is no current gal dependancy specified in the ebuild at all. adding the following dependancy works:
=gnome-extra/gal-1.99.11*

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.emerge libgtkhtml-3.0.10-r1
2.
3.

Actual Results:  
libgtkhtml's configure script complained about the lack of gal-2.0 >= 1.99.11

Expected Results:  
compiled and installed libgtkhtml
Comment 1 foser (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-08-10 13:59:29 UTC
hmm yeah this is a problem lqx, although it only happens if you remove some blocks from p.mask atm.
Comment 2 Chris Irwin 2004-08-10 14:33:08 UTC
Only partially, however. You are correct in gal-2.1 being in package.mask, but libgtkhtml does not have any gal dependancy listed at all. 

I suppose without removing the mask, another package would have depended on gal already and this issue would not appear, but libgtkhtml's ebuild should still properly list dependancies.
Comment 3 foser (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-08-10 14:54:12 UTC
the gal dep is there alright, but it's not strict enough anymore.
Comment 4 foser (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-08-10 15:04:07 UTC
went ahead & fixed it, tnx for the report.
Comment 5 Chris Irwin 2004-08-10 21:43:08 UTC
Thanks for fixing, and I actually apologize for missing the existing gal dep, especially since after going back and checking, it was the first one listed.