Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 596866 - >=x11-libs/cairo-1.14.4 with ABI_X86="32 64" - install failed: Header checksum mismatch, aborting.
Summary: >=x11-libs/cairo-1.14.4 with ABI_X86="32 64" - install failed: Header checksu...
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Alexandre Rostovtsev (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2016-10-11 14:31 UTC by ephemer0l
Modified: 2017-03-26 19:03 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
build.log (file_596866.txt,507.83 KB, text/plain)
2016-10-11 14:31 UTC, ephemer0l
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description ephemer0l 2016-10-11 14:31:15 UTC
Created attachment 449868 [details]
build.log

I'm getting header mismatch errors on both 1.14.4 and 1.14.6, I've not tried lower versions. ABI="64" had installed in the past. I tried to install gnome-base/librsvg but it's a chicken, egg, scenario with cairo.
Comment 1 Rafał Mużyło 2016-10-13 13:23:48 UTC
Check how exactly the headers in question differ - going by the ebuild, DirectFB should already be covered...

If it does come down to librsvg, you might need need some temporary useflag changes, but that will effectively invalidate this problem as a bug.
Comment 2 Matt Turner gentoo-dev 2017-02-25 23:55:24 UTC
Can you confirm that disabling USE=directfb avoids the problem?
Comment 3 ephemer0l 2017-03-14 01:37:23 UTC
I can confirm disabling directfb allows it to build.
Comment 4 Matt Turner gentoo-dev 2017-03-14 01:54:48 UTC
Is that something you actually need? directfb is package.use.mask'd on cairo, so you went out of your way to enable it. It's package.use.mask'd exactly for this reason -- because dev-libs/DirectFB isn't ported to multilib.

It's not something I'm excited about supporting. I don't have any use for it. I'm not sure what it's good for these days...
Comment 5 ephemer0l 2017-03-26 19:03:15 UTC
Well, development for directfb is back [1], so there's that.

[1] http://www.directfb.net/