5965 – rsync tar files rather than downloads/source trees?

Bug 5965 - rsync tar files rather than downloads/source trees?

Summary: rsync tar files rather than downloads/source trees?

Status:	RESOLVED FIXED

Alias:	None

Product:	Portage Development
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	Core (show other bugs)
Hardware:	All Linux

Importance:	High enhancement (vote)
Assignee:	Daniel Robbins (RETIRED)

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2002-08-03 11:19 UTC by Chris Bainbridge (RETIRED)
Modified:	2011-10-30 22:38 UTC (History)
CC List:	1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required:	---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Chris Bainbridge (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2002-08-03 11:19:58 UTC

I did some tests with rsync that showed some good improvements rsyncing tar  
files rather than .bz2 or the whole portage tree. Read it at  
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=10108  
  
Maybe its worth thinking about for the next portage. I'm also interested if  
any of the portage developers have tried something like this or experimented  
with different rsync blocksizes.

Comment 1 SpanKY gentoo-dev

2002-08-03 23:31:35 UTC

http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5982 also deals with improving rsync

Comment 2 SpanKY gentoo-dev

2002-08-03 23:36:11 UTC

err, i meant Bug 5981, sorry

Comment 3 Daniel Robbins (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2002-12-10 10:29:18 UTC

This isn't too feasible. (then we'd need a central mega-rsync distfile repo).
Closing this bug.