Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 591400 - archives: Please make it possibly to conveniently reply to mails from archives
Summary: archives: Please make it possibly to conveniently reply to mails from archives
Status: CONFIRMED
Alias: None
Product: Websites
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Archives (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Infrastructure
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2016-08-16 15:50 UTC by Michał Górny
Modified: 2016-08-17 22:12 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Michał Górny archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2016-08-16 15:50:16 UTC
Right now replying to mails you didn't receive directly (and e.g. found in the archives) is awfully painful, and hard to get right. I think it'd be really beneficial if we could find a way to make this easier. It'd be especially important if we actually start reviews by mail (as was requested as an alternative to GitHub) where some of the interested parties wouldn't be in CC from mail one.

One possible option is to have 'resend this to me' option in archives to get a mail or a whole thread resent to a developer, with preserved threading-related headers, so that he could reply straight to the received mail. However, this would probably either require some auth on archives site, or maybe manual triggering via some script on woodpecker.

Another option would be to have mbox format export, so developers could import the mails into their mail client.
Comment 1 Robin Johnson archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2016-08-16 21:11:33 UTC
For 'resend this to me', we can give you an address like
gentoo-dev+get-77211@lists.gentoo.org

That will send you message #77211 from the gentoo-dev list; optionally only if you are subscribed.

UX:
- Web page has a link for "Request an email copy of this mail", it will give you a URL of 'mailto:gentoo-dev+get-77211@lists.gentoo.org'.
- User sends the request email
- User gets the original email back

The only slight catch is that it's a pain to parse the message number from mails. The only place you can presently get it is in the return path.
Comment 2 Kristian Fiskerstrand (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2016-08-16 21:53:31 UTC
(In reply to Robin Johnson from comment #1)
> For 'resend this to me', we can give you an address like
> gentoo-dev+get-77211@lists.gentoo.org
> 
> That will send you message #77211 from the gentoo-dev list; optionally only
> if you are subscribed.
> 
> UX:
> - Web page has a link for "Request an email copy of this mail", it will give
> you a URL of 'mailto:gentoo-dev+get-77211@lists.gentoo.org'.
> - User sends the request email
> - User gets the original email back
> 
> The only slight catch is that it's a pain to parse the message number from
> mails. The only place you can presently get it is in the return path.

this sounds like a good suggestion, so +1 for a feature like this
Comment 3 Michał Górny archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2016-08-17 05:40:31 UTC
(In reply to Robin Johnson from comment #1)
> For 'resend this to me', we can give you an address like
> gentoo-dev+get-77211@lists.gentoo.org
> 
> That will send you message #77211 from the gentoo-dev list; optionally only
> if you are subscribed.
> 
> UX:
> - Web page has a link for "Request an email copy of this mail", it will give
> you a URL of 'mailto:gentoo-dev+get-77211@lists.gentoo.org'.
> - User sends the request email
> - User gets the original email back

Works for me.

> The only slight catch is that it's a pain to parse the message number from
> mails. The only place you can presently get it is in the return path.

What is the message number, exactly? Maybe we could just use the hash used to identify mails on archives.
Comment 4 Robin Johnson archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2016-08-17 22:12:34 UTC
(In reply to Michał Górny from comment #3)
> What is the message number, exactly? Maybe we could just use the hash used
> to identify mails on archives.
It's a sequence number assigned by the mlmmj list manager, when initially receiving a mail for distribution. The hash is introduced separately during our archival process, and the list manager has no knowledge of it.