Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 588668 - dev-lang/mono check_extra_config give a non-fatal warning under prefix.
Summary: dev-lang/mono check_extra_config give a non-fatal warning under prefix.
Status: RESOLVED OBSOLETE
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo/Alt
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Prefix Support (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: dotnet project
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2016-07-12 09:43 UTC by Jean-Benoist Leger
Modified: 2021-01-06 13:03 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
build.log (build.log,2.32 KB, text/x-log)
2016-07-12 09:43 UTC, Jean-Benoist Leger 		Details
die.env (die.env,228.85 KB, text/plain)
2016-07-12 09:43 UTC, Jean-Benoist Leger 		Details
output of emerge --info (emerge--info.txt,4.92 KB, text/plain)
2016-07-12 09:44 UTC, Jean-Benoist Leger 		Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jean-Benoist Leger 2016-07-12 09:43:13 UTC 
Created attachment 440430 [details]
build.log

check_extra_config in pkg_pretend() of the ebuild fails compiling mono in a prefix (RAP). See build.log

When I delete this line in pkg_pretend() the compilation works fine. Should this check could be disabled with prefix or changed into a warning? Or something similar?
Comment 1 Jean-Benoist Leger 2016-07-12 09:43:50 UTC 
Created attachment 440432 [details]
die.env
Comment 2 Jean-Benoist Leger 2016-07-12 09:44:22 UTC 
Created attachment 440434 [details]
output of emerge --info
Comment 3 Benda Xu gentoo-dev 2016-07-13 01:45:30 UTC 
It is caused by linux-info.eclass.  It should look into ${EROOT}usr/src/linux, not ${ROOT}usr/src/linux.
Comment 4 Fabian Groffen gentoo-dev 2021-01-06 13:03:18 UTC 
fixing linux-info.eclass is disputable (we don't provide the kernel), the check could be non-fatal on Prefix though.  I guess it needs revisiting in any case.