Created attachment 440008 [details] xed-1.0.5.ebuild my ebuild for fork of gedit
Are you interested in maintaining this package? https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Proxy_Maintainers
No: i not good know english, i not good know a syntax of ebuild. Maybe in my xed.ebuild something wrong.
Cinnamon project is not interested, removing CC
Created attachment 454336 [details] app-editors/xed-1.2.1 I'm under the impression that xed is also the successor project to pluma, which is in the portage tree and the editor for the Mate desktop environment so perhaps it's something important to maintain? This is a slightly modified ebuild that removes some of the unneeded dependencies (like on vala), added a new needed dependency on x11-libs/xapps and made a few minor stylistic cleanups. It seems that the "xapps suite", which I believe currently only includes xed (a fork of gedit-2/plume) and xplayer (a fork of totem), will become a set of drop-in components for several GTK-based desktop environments.
(In reply to Niranjan from comment #4) > Created attachment 454336 [details] > app-editors/xed-1.2.1 > > I'm under the impression that xed is also the successor project to pluma, > which is in the portage tree and the editor for the Mate desktop environment > so perhaps it's something important to maintain? This is a slightly > modified ebuild that removes some of the unneeded dependencies (like on > vala), added a new needed dependency on x11-libs/xapps and made a few minor > stylistic cleanups. It seems that the "xapps suite", which I believe > currently only includes xed (a fork of gedit-2/plume) and xplayer (a fork of > totem), will become a set of drop-in components for several GTK-based > desktop environments. Hello, would you be willing to maintain this package through Proxy maintainers project? https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Proxy_Maintainers
Created attachment 457464 [details] app-editors/xed-1.2.2 Version bump to 1.2.2, EAPI changed to 6. Keywords need to be checked, I think I kept the keywords from the original ebuild posted here but they seem over-enthusiastic. At the very least, I suspect this should be keyworded as ~. I'm willing to give proxy maintenance a shot. However, as a practical matter it seems that there are a number of moving parts to the "X-Apps" project. The suite is a set of tools and not just Xed (a fork of pluma). It also includes Xplayer (a fork of Totem), Xviewer (a fork of EoG), Xreader (a fork of Atril) and Pix (a fork of gThumb). Does it make sense to maintain each X-App independently or should they be maintained together as a suite? Perhaps more importantly (since I don't think each constituent component of the suite actually relies on any of the others), these apps also rely on the x11-libs/xapps library and so it seems that there should be some coordination with the maintainer of that library (assuming there is one).
(In reply to Niranjan from comment #6) > Created attachment 457464 [details] > app-editors/xed-1.2.2 > IUSE="+python spell test" ............... gnome2_src_configure \ --enable-gvfs-metadata \ $(use_enable spell) \ $(use_enable python) \ $(use_enable test tests) because configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --with-gtk also i add flag for test
fyi, I've added a working ebuild of the newest version to my overlay (haarp)
Created attachment 478034 [details] app-editors/xed-1.4.3 Thanks haarp. I've bumped your ebuild to 1.4.3.
Created attachment 478340 [details] app-editors/xed-1.4.4
Created attachment 481114 [details] app-editors/xed-1.4.5
I don't think a new package for every version bump is necessary, since looking at the commit history, the changes between each version are truly trivial.
Created attachment 503278 [details] xed-1.6.0.ebuild a new xed version with minimap feature
I'm happy to volunteer for to maintain any packages related to Cinnamon so please feel free to contact me to discuss the details.
